2020
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/852/1/012058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete Structure Condition Rating in Buildings with Non-Destructive Testing

Abstract: Concrete damage on building is translated as a condition change from concrete quality. The damage that is referred to can be in the form of physical change or concrete quality downgrade on a building. This change can be caused by several reasons, such as implementation error, building overload, building function change, inadequate building maintenance, natural condition, and natural disaster. Concrete damage condition on buildings can be identified by performing a condition rating assessment. Condition rating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poorarbabi et al [17] examined the conversion factors between NDT of cube and cylindrical concrete specimens. A concept of condition rating was suggested by Wiyanto et al [18] based on analysis of the results of NDT. Estimate of conservative strength for existing structure from NDT results was discussed by Dauji et al [19], but the data used in the study was pair-wise NDT and PDT results, from which site-specific correlation expressions could be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poorarbabi et al [17] examined the conversion factors between NDT of cube and cylindrical concrete specimens. A concept of condition rating was suggested by Wiyanto et al [18] based on analysis of the results of NDT. Estimate of conservative strength for existing structure from NDT results was discussed by Dauji et al [19], but the data used in the study was pair-wise NDT and PDT results, from which site-specific correlation expressions could be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%