2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete-to-concrete interface shear strength prediction based on explainable extreme gradient boosting approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed ML‐models for post‐earthquake bridge tagging are “black‐box” models, which directly give the tagging results from the inputs. In order to understand how the input features can affect the tagging results, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique 52–54 is adopted herein to explain the XGBoost model. The SHAP comes from the idea of game‐theory, which simplifies the output as the linear addition of the inputs, therefore, the SHAP can quantitatively evaluate the contribution of each input feature to the outputs.…”
Section: Results Of the Proposed Ml‐based Tagging Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed ML‐models for post‐earthquake bridge tagging are “black‐box” models, which directly give the tagging results from the inputs. In order to understand how the input features can affect the tagging results, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique 52–54 is adopted herein to explain the XGBoost model. The SHAP comes from the idea of game‐theory, which simplifies the output as the linear addition of the inputs, therefore, the SHAP can quantitatively evaluate the contribution of each input feature to the outputs.…”
Section: Results Of the Proposed Ml‐based Tagging Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML models for classification have proven valuable for damage detection in structures, as evidenced by studies on bridges [35][36][37][38], beam/column members [39][40][41], plate/panel members [42,43], and joints [44,45]. Regression models have applications in various predictive tasks, addressing shear resistance in beams [46,47], slabs [48], joints [49,50], axial strength of concrete columns [51], steel columns [52], concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) columns [53], deflection of concrete beams [54], and data-driven optimization for torsion design of CFRP-CFST [55].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques have been widely used to predict structural status in recent years. Compared to traditional models, machine learning is a data-driven model that takes into account multiple parameters and is adaptive, and the accuracy of the model will improve as the size of the data increases in the future [20][21][22] Naderpour et al used decision tree and neural networks to predict the failure modes of reinforced concrete columns [23]. Zhang et al used six machine learning methods, neural networks, support vector machines, decision tree, gradient boosting decision tree, random forests, and extreme gradient boosting to predict the bond strength of FRP-concrete interfaces [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%