2009
DOI: 10.1177/0734282909343763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Raven Progressive Matrices and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test

Abstract: The concurrent and predictive validities of the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) and Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) were investigated in a large group of Italian third-and fifth-grade students with different sociocultural levels evaluated at the beginning and end of the school year. CPM and NNAT scores were related to math and reading comprehension tests. The CPM and NNAT concurrent and predictive validity coefficients were moderate, and there were no differences between concurrent and predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Kuder-Richardson formula, reliability coefficients range between .81 and .88 (McCallum, Bracken, & Wasserman, 2001). The NNAT also predicts academic achievement (Balboni, Naglieri, & Cubelli, 2010). Convergent validity with academic knowledge tests has ranged between .32 and .63 (Naglieri, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using the Kuder-Richardson formula, reliability coefficients range between .81 and .88 (McCallum, Bracken, & Wasserman, 2001). The NNAT also predicts academic achievement (Balboni, Naglieri, & Cubelli, 2010). Convergent validity with academic knowledge tests has ranged between .32 and .63 (Naglieri, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Jones (2006) found correlations below .10 between UNIT scores in first grade and reading achievement on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) in third grade for both ELL and non‐ELL students. Even in non‐ELL samples, the correlations between nonverbal tests and achievement usually range between .3 and .6 (e.g., Balboni, Naglieri, & Cubelli, 2010; Naglieri & Ronning, 2000). These values are far below what is typically observed for CogAT verbal and quantitative batteries with non‐ELL samples, which predict their relevant domain of achievement (reading and mathematics, respectively) with correlations of .75–.80 (Lakin & Lohman, 2011).…”
Section: Use Of Nonverbal Ability Tests With Ell Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would seemingly support Naglieri's (2006) claim that nonverbal aptitude testing is able to gauge general aptitude as well as aptitude testing that does utilize language. It would also seem to be in line with previous research by Balboni, Naglieri, and Cubelli (2010) and Naglieri and Ronning (2000), who came to a similar conclusion.…”
Section: Hypothesis Onesupporting
confidence: 92%