2004
DOI: 10.1177/0306624x03257714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Cross-Validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A Tool for Assessing Violent and Nonviolent Recidivism and Institutional Adjustment on a Sample of North Carolina Offenders

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine whether the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ), a tool that was found to be reliable and valid for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment for Canadian offenders, would also be valid for the same purposes with a demographically different population of North Carolina offenders. The internal consistency alphas and SAQ total and subscale scores' correlations were high. Offenders with high SAQ total scores had significantly more violent offens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second goal was to determine if the SAQ is valid for use with White, African American, and Asian female offenders. Based on previous results (Loza, Conley, & Warren, 2004b;Loza et al, 2004a), it was hypothesized that the SAQ would be valid for use with White, African American, and Asian female offenders. Table 1 provides a summary of participant characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second goal was to determine if the SAQ is valid for use with White, African American, and Asian female offenders. Based on previous results (Loza, Conley, & Warren, 2004b;Loza et al, 2004a), it was hypothesized that the SAQ would be valid for use with White, African American, and Asian female offenders. Table 1 provides a summary of participant characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAQ produces a Total score and 7 subscale scores subscales (ie, Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Anger, Antisocial Associates, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Conduct Problems, Criminal History, and Criminal Tendencies). This measure has evidenced adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from .69 to .88), 20,21 and concurrent and predictive validity for assessing recidivism. 22 High SAQ Total scores are associated with significantly higher rates of violent offenses and institutional infractions, as well as a greater frequency of previous offenses and arrests, 20 reconviction, 21 and reincarceration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAQ is a self-administered questionnaire comprising seven subscales which are focused on the application of the principles of risk, need and responsivity to offender assessment (cf. Loza, 2003;Loza, Conley & Warren, 2004;Loza, Cumbleton, Shahinfar, Evans, Conley, & Summers, 2004): namely Criminal Tendencies, Antisocial Personality Problems, Conduct Problems, Criminal History, Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Antisocial Associates, and Anger (Loza, 2005).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%