1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61180-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Design and Process Planning of Rotational Parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design tools that balance assembly and disassembly requirements are described by Molloy et al [114]. Multiple rule bases are used by Domazet et al [115] to influence early stage design decisions according to different manufacturing perspectives. Wilhelm and Lu [116] developed a design synthesis approach that allows design requirements and fabrication strategies to be traded off via a parametric negotiation.…”
Section: Related Cirp Efforts and Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design tools that balance assembly and disassembly requirements are described by Molloy et al [114]. Multiple rule bases are used by Domazet et al [115] to influence early stage design decisions according to different manufacturing perspectives. Wilhelm and Lu [116] developed a design synthesis approach that allows design requirements and fabrication strategies to be traded off via a parametric negotiation.…”
Section: Related Cirp Efforts and Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a difficult task that requires ''material, shape and process'' to be ''considered simultaneously'' [7]. Process planning is sometimes considered to be a problem of requirements and information gathering [5,8,9], knowledge and information management [5,[10][11][12][13], or decision making [3]. However, these perspectives are based on an assumption that all required information can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tendency to use mixed techniques of knowledge representation, including combinations of frames, rules and networks, was inherent to the next generation of CAPPES designed. They are Turbo-CAPP (Wang and Wysk 1987), DPP (Iwata and Fukuda 1989), XROT (Domazet and Lu 1992), etc. As a rule, those systems operated with a restricted piece of the machining domain knowledge and covered a few process planning subtasks, e.g., operations selection, tool selection, grouping operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%