Concurrent engineering: an overview for Autotestcon

Pennell, James P.; Winner, Robert I.; Bertrand, H.E.; Slusarczuk, Marko M.

doi:10.1109/autest.1989.81104

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to answer these primary questions, this paper presents a common understanding of established NPD and NSD processes; then it offers a summary of relevant trends of IoT, and closing with implications for emergent approaches towards the IoT. The first stage focused on issues surrounding traditional NPD (Cooper, 1990;Booz, Allen & Hamilton, 1982;Trott, 2012;Takeuchi & Nonaka, 1986;Pennell, Winner, Bertrand, & Slusarczuk, 1989;Crawford, 1997;Baker & Hart, 1999;Cooper, 1994;Smith, 2007), NSD process (Johnson, Menor, Chase, & Roth, 2000) and innovation process identify the common characteristics of existing development processes for products and services. Secondly, it examines the key factors in digital innovation which affect approaches towards the development of hybrid products and services, including six dimensions of digital innovation (Yoo, Lyytinen, Boland & Berente, 2010); three dimensions of big data (McAfee & Brynjolfsson, 2012;Meta Group, 2001); new opportunities in digital age (Henfridsson, Mathiassen & Svahn, 2014) and three traits of innovations (Yoo et al, 2012).…”

Section: Research Goal Questions and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are Traditional NPD Processes Relevant to IoT Product and Service Development Activities? A Critical Examination

Lee¹,

Cooper²,

Hands³

2018

Proceedings of DRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasingly physical products are being equipped with sensors, which connect them to the Internet; the network of these 'smart products' are acknowledged as the Internet of Things. These digitalized artefacts have a wide variety of material properties that could include a range of outcomes, such as new products, platforms, services, and other value pathways that differentiate them from their non-digital counterparts. Practitioners and researchers acknowledge that these differences influence tremendously on IoT product and service development processes. These are significant for IoT firms that occupy the market, due to a paucity of established literature on this theme; it is difficult to find studies on NPD processes, which reflects this digitization. This is an exploratory paper. That explores current literature prior to further empirical data collection. Through a critical examination of literature, this paper examines how smart product development processes are different from traditional product development processes. Thus, this paper offers critical insights and observations to enable both practitioners and academics to ascertain a detailed understanding of diverse approaches to NPD process activities for the IoT. new product development process; internet of things; digital innovation; big data The research has involved an extensive examination of current literature surrounding these topics; articles and texts, which were broadly selected through searches of electronic databases such as

show abstract

Section: Research Goal Questions and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are Traditional NPD Processes Relevant to IoT Product and Service Development Activities? A Critical Examination

Lee¹,

Cooper²,

Hands³

2018

Proceedings of DRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consequently, many companies have discovered that there are limitations to sequential processing which increase time and cost of product development. Therefore, based on considering the project as a whole and integrating functions [24,25], simultaneous (rugby) approaches have emerged (e.g., parallel processing models [26]; Concurrent Engineering [27]; Activity-stage models [28]; Multiple convergent model [29]. This approach is proven to improve the speed of the development process and enables it to be accompanied by new philosophies of design, allowing products to be more adaptable and desirable to the customers [30].…”

Section: Iot Triggering Radical Transformation In Business Activitiementioning

confidence: 99%

Value creation for IoT: challenges and opportunities within the design and development process

Lee

Cooper

Hands

et al. 2019

Living in the Internet of Things (IoT 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IoT initiatives look promising and straightforward, but they are far more complicated to enact as it stands today. Although developing digitised artefacts offers a rich new set of value creation and growth opportunities to organisations, to grab these opportunities encompass a wide variety of strategic risks. In this context, in academia, little attention has been focused on NPD processes, development risks and value creation in IoT. Thus, this paper offers a discussion on what development risks are found, what is new approach to NPD process, and how value for IoT is created comparing its counterpart in traditional manufacturing economy. To achieve this aim, a literature review was undertaken to examine existing value creation and NPD models, which are continuously evolving but not much improved in their application to developing digitalised artefacts. Through a case study, the risks, opportunities and activities for IoT development are further elaborated and critically discussed. Finally, along with a discussion of the strategic development challenges and opportunities, a continuous process of a new NPD model for IoT products and services is proposed.

show abstract

“…However, these linear models are considered too prescriptive and mechanistic, slowing down the process, so failing to take into account overlaps of activities that will occur naturally in the workplace [42]. Base upon the idea to considering the project as a whole rather than the singular stages [38], different approaches have emerged which are deemed as 'simultaneous approach' or 'rugby approach' such as parallel processing models [13], Concurrent Engineering [43], Activity-stage models (Crawford, 1997), multiple convergent model [44] and the Third-generation model [41]. Essentially, the key benefit of these development processes is to emphasise the need for a cross-functional approach [38] in which multidisciplinary teams working together from the beginning of the process [37].…”

Section: A Design and Development Process For Value Creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

[Re]-imagining vision and values: design as a driver for value creation in the Internet of Things

Lee

Cooper

Hands

et al. 2018

Living in the Internet of Things: Cybersecurity of the IoT - 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In digital age in which a myriad of products is becoming connected through the Internet of Things (IoT), new business opportunities and challenges arise for organisations regardless of size and product/service offerings. The traits of digital technology and digital economy results in not only profound changes in the ways organisations create value and develop their IoT products and services, but also emergent and dynamic business models. It also opens new opportunities in terms of how organisations increase turnover, thus conventional theories and practices of how value is created in the design and development process is constantly being challenged. Although, academics and practitioners often critically debate these emergent opportunities and challenges to the adoption of the 'Internet of Things', there is a paucity of established academic theories and industry practices to support and re-think traditional processes of product design and development to meet current needs and potential commercial opportunities in the era of IoT. This paper will offer a critical examination on how design processes have evolved with regard to the differences in value creation between goods-dominant logic and the service-dominant logic in order to identify an emergent design process feasible for IoT product and service development. In addition, factors that affect value creation, and design and development process in the IoT are reviewed. It concludes by offering key insights and observations as to where design can contribute to value creation in the internet of things.

show abstract

Concurrent engineering: an overview for Autotestcon

Cited by 11 publications

References 5 publications

Are Traditional NPD Processes Relevant to IoT Product and Service Development Activities? A Critical Examination

Are Traditional NPD Processes Relevant to IoT Product and Service Development Activities? A Critical Examination

Value creation for IoT: challenges and opportunities within the design and development process

[Re]-imagining vision and values: design as a driver for value creation in the Internet of Things

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About