Exercise countermeasures currently administered on the International Space Station are time-consuming and use large/expensive equipment. It has been established that aerobic exercise can maintain oxidative capacity of muscle fibers, while resistance exercise can help preserve muscle mass in Astronauts and individuals in bed rest. Recently, concurrent exercise (CE) training, combining both modes, has been implemented to save time and yield similar benefits. Cotter et al. (2015) determined that CE is effective at mitigating deconditioning during simulated microgravity (unilateral lower limb suspension, ULLS) but there were differences in fiber-type responses (i.e., fast-twitch vs slow-twitch). This thesis provides additional analyses of muscle samples used in Cotter et al. (2015), investigating soleus muscle (mostly slow-twitch) myonuclei (which help to maintain cell size and function). Modulations in fiber size and myonuclear domain (MND; the area each myonuclei controls) may provide mechanisms for preventing unloading decrements. Our aim was to determine 1) if simulated microgravity affects soleus muscle fiber size and MND size and 2) if CE training mitigates these changes. Previously, 19 subjects were separated into two groups, 10-day ULLS and 10day ULLS + CE. Muscle biopsies were taken pre-and post-intervention, which were isolated into individual fibers (muscle cells), stained for myonuclei, imaged, and analyzed EFFECTS OF CONCURRENT EXERCISE DURING SIMULATED MICROGRAVITY ON SOLEUS MUSCLE FIBER MYONUCLEAR CONTENT for fiber size and MND size. 2x2 ANOVAs determined potential differences in fiber size and MND size between groups, before and after ULLS. Neither group showed significant differences in fiber size or MND size after 10 days of ULLS. These findings suggest that, while 10 days of ULLS may cause a decline in muscle function (as seen in Cotter et al., 2015), it may not be long enough to significantly affect soleus muscle fiber size or MND size. However, inter-individual responses varied from subject to subject, suggesting that some people may be responders (or non-responders) to ULLS and ULLS+CE. This suggests a need for additional analyses among individual participant to help develop "personalized" exercise countermeasures for those undergoing significant periods of unloading (e.g., people in bed rest or Astronauts).