1953
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1953.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent inbreeding and selection in the domestic fowl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economically important egg traits in chicken (yolk volume, egg weight) are known to have high heritability (Olsen and Knox, 1940;Shultz, 1953;Zhang et al, 2005). We know little about the genetic control of egg size and number in non-model animal taxa, and most of what we know comes from the common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, for which the egg size-number tradeoff is well-known (Mackay et al, 2012;Jha et al, 2015).…”
Section: Genetic Controls On Offspring Size and Fecundity In Animals:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economically important egg traits in chicken (yolk volume, egg weight) are known to have high heritability (Olsen and Knox, 1940;Shultz, 1953;Zhang et al, 2005). We know little about the genetic control of egg size and number in non-model animal taxa, and most of what we know comes from the common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, for which the egg size-number tradeoff is well-known (Mackay et al, 2012;Jha et al, 2015).…”
Section: Genetic Controls On Offspring Size and Fecundity In Animals:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glazener, Blow, Bostian and Dearstyne (1951) reported that the regression of broiler weight at 12 weeks of age on inbreeding was -0.13. Shultz (1953) reported a reduction in reproductive fitness, and a decline in November egg number and November egg weight in inbred lines of chickens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It appears usual for egg weight to be reduced by inbreeding (Roberts et al, 1952;Shultz, 1953a). However, Mueller's (1952) investigation showed no advantage from crosses involving inbred lines when these were compared with crossbreds from noninbred stock.…”
Section: Egg Sizementioning
confidence: 82%