2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent MET copy number gain and KRAS mutation is a poor prognostic factor in pancreatobiliary subtype ampullary cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be used to predict the outcomes of different AVC patients with mixed subtypes. Additionally, this algorithm was consistent with reports ( 45 , 48 ), indicating that the genomic scores were higher in patients with the pancreaticobiliary subtype (mutations of the KRAS gene) and associated with lower survival probability.…”
Section: Molecular Classification Associated With Clinical Outcomessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be used to predict the outcomes of different AVC patients with mixed subtypes. Additionally, this algorithm was consistent with reports ( 45 , 48 ), indicating that the genomic scores were higher in patients with the pancreaticobiliary subtype (mutations of the KRAS gene) and associated with lower survival probability.…”
Section: Molecular Classification Associated With Clinical Outcomessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although there were overlapping genomic alterations between the two histological subtypes, a trend has been observed ( 42 ) that more frequent KRAS mutations are found in AVC patients with the pancreaticobiliary subtype (61%) than in AVC patients with the intestinal subtype (29%). When histological subtypes were analyzed together ( 48 ), concurrent KRAS gene positivity and MET copy number gain were proven to be independent prognostic factors for DFS in AVC patients with the pancreaticobiliary subtype (HR = 4.926, P = 0.047). This may contribute to the findings that KRAS mutation is significantly associated with patients presenting with a large tumor size ( 38 ).…”
Section: Molecular Classification Associated With Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MET and HGF were expressed in 31.0% and 31.7% of gastric cancers, respectively, where approximately half of which were PD-L1 positive. PD-L1 expression was positively correlated with the overexpression of MET and HGF, which has been associated with adverse histological characteristics in many malignancies [ 13 , 31 - 33 ]. However, only MET positivity, but not HGF, was an independent factor that was upregulated and affected PD-L1 overexpression as shown by a multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MET/hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) pathway is a potential candidate, since MET-induced signaling has been reported to induce PD-L1 expression in renal cell cancers [ 12 ]. Binding of HGF to MET induces the phosphorylation of the docking site and stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathways [ 13 ], which are one of the drivers that upregulate PD-L1 expression in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer [ 6 , 14 ]. In addition, PD-L1 upregulation has been reported in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated malignancies, including gastric cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and malignant lymphoma [ 15 - 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%