2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2961746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent OFDM Demodulation and Turbo Decoding for Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication

Abstract: The Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communication (URLLC) applications have been proposed in recent years, targeting a round-trip end-to-end latency less than 1 ms with high reliability. Therefore, an order of magnitude improvements are needed in all layers of the wireless communication stack. This is a particular challenge for the physical layer, where typically a processing time of the order of microseconds is required for the computationally intensive demodulation and error correction processing, among other ope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 presents the BER performance of the offered architecture in two different implementations, one of which uses a convolutional code, and the other utilizes a turbo code. Here, the adopted turbo code has a rate of 1/2 and a constraint length of 8, including two convolutional codes [40]. It is well-known that turbo codes deliver more precise a posteriori expectations of the broadcast information compared to convolution codes, provided that both types of codes have identical parameters for code rate and constraint length [41].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 presents the BER performance of the offered architecture in two different implementations, one of which uses a convolutional code, and the other utilizes a turbo code. Here, the adopted turbo code has a rate of 1/2 and a constraint length of 8, including two convolutional codes [40]. It is well-known that turbo codes deliver more precise a posteriori expectations of the broadcast information compared to convolution codes, provided that both types of codes have identical parameters for code rate and constraint length [41].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Related Works 1) NOMA-URLLC: Due to the simple design of OMA systems, most of the recent works concentrate on exploring URLLC with OMA instead of NOMA communications [8]- [10]. As URLLC uses FBL transmissions, the well-known Shannon capacity is no longer the accurate approximation of data rates [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel sparse vector coding (SVC) scheme is proposed in [9] to further improve the reliability of short packet transmission. The authors of [10] propose a novel processing architecture capable of performing reception, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) demodulation and turbo decoding concurrently, rather than consecutively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%