2000
DOI: 10.7227/ijmee.28.4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Teaching of Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

Abstract: In this paper, we first offer a brief overview of the literature on recent efforts in engineering design education, followed by a discussion of the challenges involved with teaching engineering design at an early stage in the curriculum. We then propose an approach utilizing a multi-track teaching style that allows for concurrent teaching of engineering design, analysis and manufacturing. We provide details of how a traditional sophomore-level introductory design course at Kettering University (formerly GMI En… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideas should not be separated into content and process, theory and practice, or concepts and processes, but should be a seamless integration (Williams, 2000), presented as a way that helps students to understand the place and worth of those ideas in real life technological contexts. For example, Tavakoli and Mariappan (2000) linked successful student learning outcomes in an engineering course with the nature of the course, which utilised a pedagogical approach that aimed to give students an experience of a real life, engineering context. The pedagogical approach integrated seamlessly the components of engineering design, analysis and manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas should not be separated into content and process, theory and practice, or concepts and processes, but should be a seamless integration (Williams, 2000), presented as a way that helps students to understand the place and worth of those ideas in real life technological contexts. For example, Tavakoli and Mariappan (2000) linked successful student learning outcomes in an engineering course with the nature of the course, which utilised a pedagogical approach that aimed to give students an experience of a real life, engineering context. The pedagogical approach integrated seamlessly the components of engineering design, analysis and manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large number of design models in the literature, and the importance attributed to them by many academics, their adoption by industry is not widespread or always successful [12]. However, academia, too, has seen the need for modernisation, and many engineering departments have developed integrated design and manufacturing curricula in order to prepare students for the workplace, mirror industrial product development trends and address the needs of industry [13][14][15]. However, in general, design methods are taught at too high a level and do not provide adequate experience with design methods [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the University of Bristol, we feel it is essential for mechanical engineering students to know, at the early stages of their study, how these complex technologies can be used and integrated in product design [4]. Consequently, the Design and Manufacture courses in years 1 and 2 were reviewed and novel approaches introduced, taking on board good practice [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%