Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale–2

Connolly, Barbara H.; McClune, Nancy Oberg; Gatlin, Roberta

doi:10.1097/pep.0b013e318267c5cf

Cited by 46 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there is also evidence to suggest that the Bayley-2 may overestimate impairment, particularly in relation to motor development 22,25,26. A study comparing preterm infant outcome during different eras of Bayley Scales use found Bayley-2 MDI and PDI scores to be lower than when using either previous or later editions 22.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A study comparing preterm infant outcome during different eras of Bayley Scales use found Bayley-2 MDI and PDI scores to be lower than when using either previous or later editions 22. A lack of concurrent validity has been found between Bayley-2 PDI and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2)25 but a strong correlation was found between Bayley-3 Motor Composite scores and the PDMS-2 26. Moreover, Bayley-2 motor raw scores in preterm infants showed very stable increases from 6 to 24 months,27 but following correction using Bayley-2 norm data, the resulting Bayley-2 PDI scores were unstable over the same time period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Bayley‐2 and Bayley‐3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia

Jary

Whitelaw

Walløe

et al. 2013

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimNeuroprotection trials for neonatal encephalopathy use moderate or severe disability as an outcome, with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition (Bayley-2) Index scores of <70 as part of the criteria. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler, 3rd Development, Third Edition (Bayley-3) have superseded Bayley-2 and yield higher than expected scores in typically developing and high-risk infants. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare Bayley-2 scores and Bayley-3 scores in term-born infants surviving neonatal encephalopathy treated with hypothermia.MethodSixty-one term-born infants (37 males, 24 females; median gestational age at birth 40wks, range 36–42wks; median birthweight 3280g, range 2295–5050) following neonatal encephalopathy and hypothermia had contemporaneous assessment at 18 months using the Bayley-2 and Bayley-3.ResultsThe median Bayley-3 Cognitive Composite score was 7 points higher than the median Bayley-2 Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score and the median Bayley-3 Motor Composite score was 18 points higher than the median Bayley-2 Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. Ten children had a Bayley-2 MDI of <70; only three children had Bayley-3 combined Cognitive/Language scores of <70. Eleven children had Bayley-2 PDI scores of <70 and four had modified Bayley-3 Motor Composite scores of <70. Applying regression equations to Bayley-3 scores adjusted rates of severe delay to similar proportions found using Bayley-2 scores.InterpretationFewer children were classified with severe delay using the Bayley-3 than the Bayley-2, which prohibits direct comparison of scores. Increased Bayley-3 cut-off thresholds for classifying severe disability are recommended when comparing studies in this clinical group using Bayley-2 scores.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Bayley‐2 and Bayley‐3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia

Jary

Whitelaw

Walløe

et al. 2013

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Validity was examined for age differentiation. The correlation coefficients determined for 12-month age intervals ranged from r = .80 to .93, indicating that the subtests were associated with age, consistent with the developmental pattern of motor behaviors (Connolly, McClune, & Gatlin, 2012). At the time of the data collection, no instrument to assess motor development had been translated, adapted or validated for use in Brazil so the English version of PDMS-2 was used.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

Madaschi

Mecca

Macedo

et al. 2016

Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scales with evidence of validity and reliability are important to evaluate child development. In Brazil, there is a lack of standardized instruments to evaluate young children. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). It was translated into Brazilian Portuguese, culturally adapted and tested on 207 children (12-42 months of age). Evidence of convergent validity was obtained from correlations of the Bayley-III with the: Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2, Leiter International Performance Scale-R, Expressive Vocabulary Assessment List and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Exploratory factor analyses showed a single component explaining 86% of the variance, supported by goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis. The Bailey-III demonstrated good internal consistency with alpha coefficients greater than or equal to .90 and stability for fine motor scale only. These robust psychometric properties support the use of this tool in future national studies on child development.

show abstract

“…Although the study was designed for a specific country, the methodology used to develop and validate the new tool is applicable in any context, particularly in developing countries. Recently, several validation studies investigated the use of the Bayley scales to evaluate early child development (26)(27)(28)(29); however, many did not cover all Bayley-III domains or only targeted children within specific age ranges. Our study includes all ages that could be assessed with the Bayley-III.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The quick and easy Mongolian Rapid Baby Scale shows good concurrent validity and sensitivity

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale–2

Abstract: The study supports the substitution of the Bayley-III for the PDMS-2 for standard scores or AE scores for children aged 19 to 26 months and for standard scores for children birth to 18 months.

Cited by 46 publications

References 7 publications

Comparison of Bayley‐2 and Bayley‐3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia

Comparison of Bayley‐2 and Bayley‐3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia

Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

The quick and easy Mongolian Rapid Baby Scale shows good concurrent validity and sensitivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About