1993
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199308000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Validity of the ERGOS Work Simulator Versus Conventional Functional Capacity Evaluation Techniques in a Workers??? Compensation Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these found the ERGOS TM Work Simulator and conventional FCE techniques with respect to dynamic lower and upper lifting to have moderate concurrent validity (9). The other study found poor concurrent validity for the Isernhagen Work Systems FCE as compared to several disability questionnaires (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of these found the ERGOS TM Work Simulator and conventional FCE techniques with respect to dynamic lower and upper lifting to have moderate concurrent validity (9). The other study found poor concurrent validity for the Isernhagen Work Systems FCE as compared to several disability questionnaires (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we encountered two other studies that examine the concurrent validity of FCE methods (9,16). One of these found the ERGOS TM Work Simulator and conventional FCE techniques with respect to dynamic lower and upper lifting to have moderate concurrent validity (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most comprehensive investigations of RTW criterion validity was conducted by Dusik et al (10). They compared FCE results using a standardized testing protocol for job simulation, and then followed RTW outcomes of a functional rehabilitation program postdischarge.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been concerns identified specifically in regards to basing the physical assessment on the Dictionary o f Occupational Titles. Dusik, Menard, Cooke, Fairbum, and Beach (1993) commented that the validity of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles physical characteristics were unknown. Ten years later, Frings-Dresen and Sluiter (2003) noted that the reliability and validity o f the Dictionary of Occupational Titles physical characteristics remains questionable and related this concern directly to its impact on the validity of the Functional Capacity Evaluations.…”
Section: Component 6: Physical Abilities Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%