Objective
To describe sex differences in concussion characteristics in US Service Academy cadets.
Design
Descriptive epidemiology study.
Setting
Four US service academies.
Participants
2209 cadets (n = 867 females, n = 1342 males).
Independent Variable
Sex.
Outcome Measures
Injury proportion ratios (IPR) compared the proportion of injuries by sex (females referent) for injury situation, certainty of diagnosis, prolonged recovery, recurrent injuries, mental status alterations, loss of consciousness (LOC), posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), retrograde amnesia (RGA), motor impairments, delayed symptom presentation, and immediate reporting.
Main Results
Concussions from varsity/intercollegiate sports [IPR of 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–2.10] and intramurals (IPR of 1.53, 95% CI 1.02–2.32) accounted for a larger proportion in males, whereas concussions outside of sport and military activities accounted for a smaller proportion among males (IPR of 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.85). The proportion of concussions with prolonged recovery was lower among males (IPR of 0.69, 95% CI 0.60–0.78), while concussions with altered mental status (IPR of 1.23, 95% CI 1.09–1.38), LOC (IPR of 1.67, 95% CI 1.17–2.37), PTA (IPR of 1.94, 95% CI 1.43–2.62), and RGA (IPR of 2.14, 95% CI 1.38–3.31) accounted for a larger proportion among males. A larger proportion of concussions that were immediately reported was observed in males (IPR of 1.15, 95% CI 1.00–2.31). Proportions of other characteristics (e.g., recurrent injuries) were not different between sexes.
Conclusions
A higher proportion of concussions occurred outside of sport and military training for female cadets, who also displayed proportionally longer recovery times than males, despite males demonstrating a higher proportion of LOC, PTA, and RGA. Possible factors may include different mechanisms of injury outside of sport and military training, different biopsychosocial states associated with sex or injury context, and delayed injury reporting when outside of an observed environment, possibly secondary to perceived stigma about reporting injuries.