2020
DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concussive Symptoms Following Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the proportion of children with postconcussive symptoms (PCSs) and to explore the influence of noninjury and injury factors on parents' PCS report at 3 months postinjury. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of the 3-month postinjury data from a larger, prospective, longitudinal study. Methods: Parents and their child aged 2 to 12 years who presented at the emergency department with ei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studying children and adolescents from outpatient subspecialty concussion clinics captures a different sample of patients than those from the ED 4,17 or athletics. 18,19 A 2013 multisite study of mild TBI based in the ED 20 recruited patients with more severe or highly symptomatic initial injuries, 5,6,20,[22][23][24] Another important characteristic of the 4CYC cohort was that a substantial proportion of patients were preadolescent, while many earlier studies, particularly in sports-related TBI, have focused primarily on high school-aged youth. 18,[25][26][27] The inclusion of younger children with mild TBI can help us determine age-specific differences in symptom presentation and recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studying children and adolescents from outpatient subspecialty concussion clinics captures a different sample of patients than those from the ED 4,17 or athletics. 18,19 A 2013 multisite study of mild TBI based in the ED 20 recruited patients with more severe or highly symptomatic initial injuries, 5,6,20,[22][23][24] Another important characteristic of the 4CYC cohort was that a substantial proportion of patients were preadolescent, while many earlier studies, particularly in sports-related TBI, have focused primarily on high school-aged youth. 18,[25][26][27] The inclusion of younger children with mild TBI can help us determine age-specific differences in symptom presentation and recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in ED patients and youths with sports-related mild TBI have reported a relatively rapid recovery in most individuals, with a much smaller proportion of patients reporting ongoing symptoms at 1 month 7,21 or 3 months. 5,6,20,[22][23][24] Another important characteristic of the 4CYC cohort was that a substantial proportion of patients were preadolescent, while many earlier studies, particularly in sports-related TBI, have focused primarily on high school-aged youth. 18,[25][26][27] The inclusion of younger children with mild TBI can help us determine age-specific differences in symptom presentation and recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While proxy ratings are commonly used to assess children's mental health status and neuropsychiatric outcomes after pTBI, parent-child agreement for PCS are modest, with children generally reporting more severe symptoms [39]. In fact, research has suggested that parents' proxy ratings of persistent PCS after pTBI were more strongly associated with parental stress than with the severity of the children's injuries [67]. Since RPQ self-report assessments were found to have excellent properties in adult [14,15] and adolescent [25] populations, the use of RPQ self-reports with age-appropriate item wordings for younger children should be preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the different findings from our two models, it is clear that the sex effect sizes were significantly increased when considering patients only, so this sex difference may be specific to our patient population. Within the general context of brain injury, it is generally accepted that women are more susceptible to injury and worse outcome ( Cogan et al, 2020 , Merritt et al, 2019 , Yue et al, 2019 , Manley et al, 2017 , Cheng et al, 2019 , Yumul et al, 2020 ), although a number of recent studies have begun to question this conclusion ( Mollayeva et al, 2018 , Choleris et al, 2018 ). Of course, these results have to be viewed with caution given the relatively small size of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%