1985
DOI: 10.1090/pspum/042/791061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condensation-coherent global square systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the scale involved in the principle CS is a "Very Good Scale" in the sense of our paper [4]. This principle is closely related to some combinatorial principles of Donder et al [8] and Donder et al [7]. Definition 3.1.…”
Section: A Non-tight Mutually Stationary Sequencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We note that the scale involved in the principle CS is a "Very Good Scale" in the sense of our paper [4]. This principle is closely related to some combinatorial principles of Donder et al [8] and Donder et al [7]. Definition 3.1.…”
Section: A Non-tight Mutually Stationary Sequencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In L there exist tree-like continuous scales, even tree-like squared scales (see [5], the tree-like property comes just from condensation). In [9] Moti Gitik proved that it is possible to build a model without tree-like continuous scales using the Extender based forcing of [10,11], but it is not known if there exist infinite approachable sets in these models.…”
Section: -\mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Since C is not trivialized by a club of k, there is no /c-branch through T(po). (3) is clear from the definition (2). (4) is Lemma 1.2 on p. 4 of [11]; further, by the coherence property of C, the RHS of the inequality of (4) is < card a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We then proceed by choosing y', an immediate successor of y which does not occur in any of the previously chosen branches, and repeatedly applying (5) to the an which lie above \y'\, starting from y', as in Case 1. Note that f(y') = y, by (2), and that distinct pairs (i, y) give rise to distinct y' and therefore to distinct branches. Then, if w has been chosen as the top of the (i, y) branch, we let f(w) be any member of T\y\, distinct from y and all the f(w'), where w' is the top of a previously chosen branch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation