1999
DOI: 10.2514/2.5497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condensed Combustion Products at the Burning Surface of Aluminized Solid Propellant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Babuk et al modeled the generation of agglomerates through a detailed physical description of the process but also looked at the aluminum pocket through a statistical approach [12]. Babuk et al also made experimental works of CCP collection and measurement of propellants embedding oxidizers of varying sizes and providing agglomeration data as a function of the propellant microstructure [3].…”
Section: Investigation On Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Babuk et al modeled the generation of agglomerates through a detailed physical description of the process but also looked at the aluminum pocket through a statistical approach [12]. Babuk et al also made experimental works of CCP collection and measurement of propellants embedding oxidizers of varying sizes and providing agglomeration data as a function of the propellant microstructure [3].…”
Section: Investigation On Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ¦nal size of the agglomerates is strongly in §uenced by the residence time of the metal powders on the surface. In case of propellants containing micrometric aluminum powders, fast-and slowburning conditions should generate di¨erent scenarios as described in [3,4,6]. In the former conditions, the reduced residence time results in the so-called subpocket agglomeration that generates more agglomerates from one original pocket.…”
Section: Agglomerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Depending on the SL properties, the propellants were divided into two classes ¡ A and B [34]. For burning propellants of class A, the metal ignition temperature is less than the decomposition temperature of carbonaceous elements.…”
Section: Solid and Hybryd Propulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%