2003
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2003.0302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condensed Tannin Concentration of Rhizomatous and Nonrhizomatous Birdsfoot Trefoil in Grazed Mixtures and Monocultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work with the birdsfoot trefoil cultivars used in this study showed that the condensed tannin concentration in ARS‐2622 is higher than in Norcen (18). However, the similar levels of birdsfoot trefoil in the esophageal samples collected from heifers grazing both of these cultivars suggested that condensed tannin concentration did not influence animal selection.…”
Section: Birdsfoot Trefoil Selection By Heifersmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Previous work with the birdsfoot trefoil cultivars used in this study showed that the condensed tannin concentration in ARS‐2622 is higher than in Norcen (18). However, the similar levels of birdsfoot trefoil in the esophageal samples collected from heifers grazing both of these cultivars suggested that condensed tannin concentration did not influence animal selection.…”
Section: Birdsfoot Trefoil Selection By Heifersmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Once intercept and slope shifts for the individual environments were removed, linear regressions with maturity score explained about 78% the variation in CT content. not be affected by the presence of other plant species in the sward (Marshall et al, 2010;Wen et al, 2003). Accounting for maturity score effects on CT in each of the 10 environments narrowed the range, but had little effect on the ranking of BFT cultivars for adjusted CT content (Table 4).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Dmy Morphological Development And Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulated experimental evidence for and against the so-called plant defense theory [15][16][17][18] is equivocal 19,20 and its usefulness for the practical application in agronomy disputable 14 . Previous studies of seasonal fluctuations of tannin concentrations in forage plants yielded conflicting results 14,[21][22][23][24] and mechanisms driving seasonal and developmental dynamics of tannin concentrations under field conditions are not yet well understood. Based on an experiment with potted Onobrychis viciifolia and Lotus corniculatus, it has been suggested that fluctuations in condensed tannin concentrations in harvestable aboveground biomass are functions of biomass proportions between tannin-rich leaves and tannin-poor stems in pure stands, and of biomass proportions between tanniferous and non-tanniferous plant species in mixed stands 14 .…”
Section: Plant Sciences and Forage Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 99%