2015
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2014.2354912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Diagnosability of <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$(n,k)$</tex></formula>-Star Networks Under the Comparison Diagnosis Model

Abstract: The -star graph, denoted by , is an enhanced version of -dimensional star graphs , that has better scalability than , and possesses several good properties, compared with hypercubes. Diagnosis has been one of the most important issues for maintaining multiprocessor-system reliability. Conditional diagnosability, which is more general than classical diagnosability, measures the multiprocessor-system diagnosability under the assumption that all neighbors of any processor in the system cannot fail simultaneously.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They consider the situation that any fault set cannot contain all the neighbor vertices of any vertex in a system. The restricted diagnosability of the system has received much attention [5,6,20,24,25,38]. In 2012, Peng et al [27] proposed a measure for fault diagnosis of the system, namely, the g-good-neighbor diagnosability (which is also called the ggood-neighbor conditional diagnosability), which requires that every fault-free node has at least g fault-free neighbors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consider the situation that any fault set cannot contain all the neighbor vertices of any vertex in a system. The restricted diagnosability of the system has received much attention [5,6,20,24,25,38]. In 2012, Peng et al [27] proposed a measure for fault diagnosis of the system, namely, the g-good-neighbor diagnosability (which is also called the ggood-neighbor conditional diagnosability), which requires that every fault-free node has at least g fault-free neighbors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is impossible that all neighbors of some processor are simultaneously faulty, Zhang and Yang [36] proposed the gextra conditional diagnosability (defined in Section II), which is a generalization of conditional diagnosability [3], [19], [20]. The g-extra conditional diagnosability is defined under the assumption that every component of the system removing a set of faulty vertices has more than g vertices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then |A| = (n − 4) + 3 = n − 1 and |F 1 | = |F 2 | = n. See Figure 10. We conclude that F 1 and F 2 are indistinguishable 1-good-neighbor conditional faulty sets under the MM * model from the proof of [4]. By Lemma 2.11, we have t 1 (S n,2 ) ≤ n − 1 under the MM * model, where n ≥ 4.…”
Section: Proof Letmentioning
confidence: 63%