2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3263487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Exchange Rate Pass-Through: Evidence from Sweden

Abstract: The pass-through from exchange rate changes to inflation differs depending on the underlying shock. This paper quantifies the conditional exchange rate pass-through (CERPT) to prices, i.e. the change in prices relative to that in the exchange rate following a certain exogenous shock, with a structural econometric approach using data for Sweden, a small economy that is very open to trade. We find that the pass-through to consumer prices following an exogenous exchange rate shock is rather small. Importantly, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…] First, the narrative-sign-identified exchange rate shock contributes more to the exchange rate movement than the counterpart identified by the traditional approach. Similar to Forbes et al (2018b), Comunale and Kunovac (2017) and Corbo et al (2018), we find that the traditional exchange rate shock only explains around 25% of the variation in the exchange rate over the horizons while other shocks, especially the supply shock and the demand shock, account for the majority of the variation. This sharply contrasts with the variance decomposition obtained using the narrative sign restrictions, in which the exogenous exchange rate shock accounts for 70% at the one-month horizon and 60% over the long run; the supply shock and the demand shock each account for around 10%.…”
Section: Shock Contribution and The Time-varying Erpt Ratiosupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…] First, the narrative-sign-identified exchange rate shock contributes more to the exchange rate movement than the counterpart identified by the traditional approach. Similar to Forbes et al (2018b), Comunale and Kunovac (2017) and Corbo et al (2018), we find that the traditional exchange rate shock only explains around 25% of the variation in the exchange rate over the horizons while other shocks, especially the supply shock and the demand shock, account for the majority of the variation. This sharply contrasts with the variance decomposition obtained using the narrative sign restrictions, in which the exogenous exchange rate shock accounts for 70% at the one-month horizon and 60% over the long run; the supply shock and the demand shock each account for around 10%.…”
Section: Shock Contribution and The Time-varying Erpt Ratiosupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A recent strand of the ERPT literature, pioneered by Shambaugh (2008) and Forbes et al (2018a), shows with a structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model that ERPT is shock-dependent, with the extent of ERPT depending on the types of exogenous shocks that trigger the exchange rate movements. This finding is subsequently confirmed by studies such as Borensztein and Queijo Von Heideken (2016) for six South American countries, Comunale and Kunovac (2017) for the euro area, Corbo et al (2018) for Sweden, Forbes et al (2018b) for twenty-six advanced economies, Comunale (2019) for three Baltic states and Ha et al (2019) for a collection of forty-seven countries around the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The limited number of papers that have made some attempt to model the underlying shocks include: Shambaugh (2008), which was the first paper to identify a set of shocks to exchange rates for several countries through long-run restrictions, and more recently , which develops a more extensive SVAR framework to study shock-dependent exchange rate pass-through in the UK. 2 Comunale and Kunovac (2017) and Corbo and Di Casola (2018) also apply this latter SVAR framework to selected euro area economies and Sweden, respectively. These SVAR studies all find evidence for the specific country (or region) on which they focus, supporting theoretical work that a given exchange rate movement can be associated with very different price dynamics depending on the underlying shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%