2018
DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Families and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth Homelessness: Gender, Sexuality, Family Instability, and Rejection

Abstract: Existing research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) youth homelessness identifies family rejection as a main pathway into homelessness for the youth. This finding, however, can depict people of color or poor people as more prejudiced than White, middle‐class families. In this 18‐month ethnographic study, the author complicates this rejection paradigm through documenting the narratives of 40 LGBTQ youth experiencing homelessness. The author examines how poverty and family instability sha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
106
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
106
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Often reliant on family networks for support, LGBTQ+ youth navigate family-based processes surrounding reactions to their LGBTQ+ identities (Savin-Williams, 2005). These familial reactions to LGBTQ+ young people's identities are often strongly influenced by youth's social backgrounds, such as their race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic statuses (Robinson, 2018;Schmitz & Tyler, 2018). For instance, poverty can limit the family support LGBTQ+ youth receive, as families are already struggling with securing basic needs (Robinson, 2018;McConnell et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often reliant on family networks for support, LGBTQ+ youth navigate family-based processes surrounding reactions to their LGBTQ+ identities (Savin-Williams, 2005). These familial reactions to LGBTQ+ young people's identities are often strongly influenced by youth's social backgrounds, such as their race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic statuses (Robinson, 2018;Schmitz & Tyler, 2018). For instance, poverty can limit the family support LGBTQ+ youth receive, as families are already struggling with securing basic needs (Robinson, 2018;McConnell et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These familial reactions to LGBTQ+ young people's identities are often strongly influenced by youth's social backgrounds, such as their race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic statuses (Robinson, 2018;Schmitz & Tyler, 2018). For instance, poverty can limit the family support LGBTQ+ youth receive, as families are already struggling with securing basic needs (Robinson, 2018;McConnell et al, 2015). Furthermore, national surveys conclude that processes of racialization impact LGBTQ+ youth of color's family relationships experiences, as racialized stereotypes and societal marginalization shape familial dynamics among LGBTQ+ youth of color if they perceive their families to be unaccepting (Toomey et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, B. A. Robinson () has argued that conditional families are those in which “certain terms or conditions related to gender and sexuality had to be met for the youth to be a part of the family” (p. 387). He argued that this framework adds clarity to the emotional implications of offering family support contingent upon certain conditions, and particularly of “the conditions of poverty and family instability [and] the larger social conditions that shape the experiences of some LGBTQ youth” whose families marginalize them (p. 387).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the SGD families has expanded dramatically in the past two decades (Moore & Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, 2013). Most research on the relationship between SGD people and their families of origin focus on negative or ambivalent family experiences (LaSala, 2002;Reczek, 2016;Robinson, 2018;Savin-Williams & Dub e, 1998;Scherrer, Kazyak, & Schmitz, 2015;Schmitz & Tyler, 2018). For example, this research extensively explores family rejection as the main pathway to homelessness for LGBTQ youth (Robinson, 2018).…”
Section: Role Models For Sgd Poci Adults and Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on the relationship between SGD people and their families of origin focus on negative or ambivalent family experiences (LaSala, 2002;Reczek, 2016;Robinson, 2018;Savin-Williams & Dub e, 1998;Scherrer, Kazyak, & Schmitz, 2015;Schmitz & Tyler, 2018). For example, this research extensively explores family rejection as the main pathway to homelessness for LGBTQ youth (Robinson, 2018). This scholarship focuses on the experiences of White SGD people, youth, and people with negative relationships with families of origin.…”
Section: Role Models For Sgd Poci Adults and Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%