2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional independence of blocked ordered data

Abstract: In this paper, we prove that blocks of ordered data formed by some conditioning events are mutually independent. We establish this result by considering the usual order statistics, progressively censored order statistics, and concomitants of order statistics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This property causes a lot of problems in inference and distribution theory so that most results are obtained conditional on the assumption that at least one observation is available. Moreover, from a mathematical point of view, the (conditional) distribution theory is complicated and only a few results have been established in this direction (see, e.g., Balakrishnan 2007;Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan 2009;Balakrishnan et al, 2011;Balakrishnan and Cramer 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This property causes a lot of problems in inference and distribution theory so that most results are obtained conditional on the assumption that at least one observation is available. Moreover, from a mathematical point of view, the (conditional) distribution theory is complicated and only a few results have been established in this direction (see, e.g., Balakrishnan 2007;Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan 2009;Balakrishnan et al, 2011;Balakrishnan and Cramer 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k}. These random variables have also been considered in Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan (2009) who used them to prove a conditional block independence result. Notice that M = k j =1 D j .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that without changes in the failure mechanism, the lifetimes of test units follow an exponential distribution at each stress level, along with the accelerated failure time (AFT) model for the effect of changing stress. This results in the conditional block independence of the ordered failure time data as discussed by Balakrishnan and Cramer () and Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan (). Allowing the intermediate censoring to take place at each stress change time point (viz., τ i , i =1,2,…, k ), two different modes of failure inspections are considered: continuous inspection, where the exact failure times are observed, and interval inspection, where the exact failure times are not available but only the number of failures that occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Of course, f i ( t ) and F i ( t ) are as given in and , respectively. It is worth mentioning that, under the assumption of exponentiality, the AFT model coincides with the cumulative exposure model, which produces the conditional block independence of the ordered failure time data as discussed by Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan () and Balakrishnan and Cramer (). This is a critical property for deriving the expected termination time of a k ‐level step‐stress ALT under progressive Type‐I censoring, as shown in the following sections.…”
Section: Progressively Type‐i Censored Step‐stress Altmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For a proof of this result as well as some generalizations of this result, one may refer to Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan (2009).…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of North Dakota] At 03:51 19 Novemmentioning
confidence: 98%