1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00534868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional limit theorems for asymptotically stable random walks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the …rst we consider the …rst n values of a random walk conditioned on the event that all these values are non-negative; this is a discrete version of a meander, and it has been known for a long time that if the random walk is in the domain of attraction of a standard Normal law, a suitably scaled version of this process converges weakly to Brownian meander. (See [8], or [11].) The second interpretation involves conditioning on the event that the random walk never goes negative, and so can be thought of as a discrete version of the Bessel process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the …rst we consider the …rst n values of a random walk conditioned on the event that all these values are non-negative; this is a discrete version of a meander, and it has been known for a long time that if the random walk is in the domain of attraction of a standard Normal law, a suitably scaled version of this process converges weakly to Brownian meander. (See [8], or [11].) The second interpretation involves conditioning on the event that the random walk never goes negative, and so can be thought of as a discrete version of the Bessel process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For X ∈ D(2, 0) and being (h, 0) −lattice relation (9) has been obtained by Bryn-Jones and Doney [4].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the limit in (15) is an easy consequence of the invariance principle for random walks conditioned to stay positive, which was proved by Doney [3]. The most difficult part of the proof is the derivation of characterisation (16) of the limiting distribution F α,β , see Section 3.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 96%