2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional predictive Bayesian Cramér-Rao Lower Bounds for prognostic algorithms design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [74,75], there was an attempt to provide a more general insight, but it was restricted to Markov processes. Also, there was an underlying hypothesis of statistical independence in the proposed probability measures; although these measures have still proven to be useful to define a functional cost criterion for prognostic algorithm design [76]. Moreover, despite the fact that hazard zones are well known and accepted in the PHM community [13], the current state-of-the-art formalization of failure prognosis problem [77,78] still defines failure events with the classical deterministic threshold approach, is restricted to events over Markov processes, lacks of mathematical demonstrations, and has led to inconsistencies when computing FPT probability distributions with methods different from those simulating complete state trajectories of systems [74].…”
Section: Failure Prognosis In the Discipline Of Prognostics And Health Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [74,75], there was an attempt to provide a more general insight, but it was restricted to Markov processes. Also, there was an underlying hypothesis of statistical independence in the proposed probability measures; although these measures have still proven to be useful to define a functional cost criterion for prognostic algorithm design [76]. Moreover, despite the fact that hazard zones are well known and accepted in the PHM community [13], the current state-of-the-art formalization of failure prognosis problem [77,78] still defines failure events with the classical deterministic threshold approach, is restricted to events over Markov processes, lacks of mathematical demonstrations, and has led to inconsistencies when computing FPT probability distributions with methods different from those simulating complete state trajectories of systems [74].…”
Section: Failure Prognosis In the Discipline Of Prognostics And Health Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to predictive and forecast modeling methods [7] [13] and approaches with the usage of anomaly/fault prognostics and RUL (remaining useful life) estimation [14] [15] [16], which are able to predict quality downtrends through health indicators or other types of problems (failures, degradations, ...) in the future with a certain horizon, the essential point is that anomaly detection operates in a fully unsupervised manner (typically based on process data/models), which means that no quality information about the current process/system/product states needs to be available to establish appropriate predictors or forecast models. Therefore, 1.…”
Section: Motivation and State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early recognition of arising problems in form of downtrends in product quality or in form of cases where measures for product quality are expected to fall out of allowed tolerance limits in a latter/final stage of production. For the first task, usually techniques from the fields of forecasting [5] and prognostics [6], [7] are applied, which can either rely on process parameter settings (static case) or process values recorded over time (dynamic case). Supervision of process parameters were proposed in [8] (there for a phone camera lens injection molding machine) and in [9] (there for plastic injection moulding).…”
Section: Motivation and State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is leaned on the concepts demonstrated in [32] for dynamically adjusting the forgetting factor Λ in the adaptive learning and evolution process of the fuzzy models. This factor is integrated 1. in the recursive fuzzily weighted least squares formulas for the rule consequents, see Equations (7) to (9).…”
Section: Dynamic Forgettingmentioning
confidence: 99%