2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Survival in Heart Transplantation: An Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Database Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our institutional conditional survival rates were comparable to the rates reported for de novo or post long-term circulatory support transplant recipients in large American databases or European transplant centers within the Eurotransplant or Scandiatransplant region [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our institutional conditional survival rates were comparable to the rates reported for de novo or post long-term circulatory support transplant recipients in large American databases or European transplant centers within the Eurotransplant or Scandiatransplant region [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Currently, the survival of patients receiving organ transplantation remains unsatisfactory, with a five-year survival of 89.6% ( 75 ), 86.6% ( 76 ), and 77% ( 77 ) in the liver, kidney, and heart transplantation, respectively. Although immunosuppression has been widely used to inhibit acute graft- vs -host disease after organ transplantation ( 78 ), many complications (like heart failure or acute kidney injury) increase morbidity and mortality ( 79 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, the risk set population was restricted only to recipients who survived the first year after transplant, as previously described. 19 Univariate and multivariable Cox regressions were used to compare survival by bridging strategy as previously mentioned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to no-BTT recipients, MV-only BTT recipients were more likely to be intubated at 72 hours posttransplant (67.4% vs. 23.4%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.60 [95% CI: 2.86-7.38], p < 0.001; Table 3) and had longer median hospital lengths of stay (27 [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] vs. 16 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]…”
Section: Perioperative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%