2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-010-9138-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional versus unconditional persistence of RNOA components: implications for valuation

Abstract: Financial analysis often involves decomposing variables into components, emphasizing the structured hierarchy among ratios. We distinguish between unconditional persistence (a variable's autocorrelation coefficient), and conditional persistence (the power of a variable's persistence to explain the persistence of a variable higher in the hierarchy). We argue that a variable's conditional persistence determines the magnitude of its market reaction, allowing us to predict the relative magnitude of the market reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 We hypothesize that historical cost measurement of assets will lead to persistent biases in the asset turnover ratio due to prolonged differences in the monetary basis of sales and assets. Consistent with prior research, we find that asset turnover is more persistent than profit margin and return on net operating assets (e.g., Fairfield and Yohn 2001;Nissim and Penman 2001;Penman and Zhang 2002;Soliman 2008;Amir et al 2011). One explanation for the higher persistence of asset turnover relative to profit margin is that economic rents from physical assets are harder to expropriate than knowledge assets (i.e., Romer 1986).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…4 We hypothesize that historical cost measurement of assets will lead to persistent biases in the asset turnover ratio due to prolonged differences in the monetary basis of sales and assets. Consistent with prior research, we find that asset turnover is more persistent than profit margin and return on net operating assets (e.g., Fairfield and Yohn 2001;Nissim and Penman 2001;Penman and Zhang 2002;Soliman 2008;Amir et al 2011). One explanation for the higher persistence of asset turnover relative to profit margin is that economic rents from physical assets are harder to expropriate than knowledge assets (i.e., Romer 1986).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, Lipe [1986] and Sloan [1996] find differences in the persistence of earnings components, suggesting that forecasts should weigh the influence of each component differently. Amir et al [2011] provide evidence that the market reacts differently to the conditional and unconditional persistence of DuPont ratios.…”
Section: Earnings Quality and The Influence On Profitability Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Soliman [2008] finds that analysts and investors do not fully impound the predictive information of PM and ATO in their decision making. Amir et al [2011] differentiate between conditional (power of a DuPont ratio's persistence to explain the persistence of a variable higher up in the DuPont hierarchy) and unconditional persistence (measured as the first-order autocorrelation coefficient) of DuPont ratios and find that RNOA components exhibit varyingly conditional and unconditional persistence. Furthermore, they find that the market's reaction to PM is stronger than to ATO.…”
Section: Forecasting Profitability In the Fsa Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Amir et al (2011) examine the persistence of DuPont ratios. Specifically, they compare unconditional persistence (a variable's…”
Section: Background Prior Research and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the relation between changes in PM and one-year-ahead changes in RNOA is re-examined by partitioning on the direction of the change in PM. Such partitioning is motivated by Amir et al (2011), who find that PM contributes more to the persistence of RNOA than ATO. This evidence suggests that information is lost when constraining the coefficient on change in PM to be equal across firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%