Conditioned “Cross Fading”: The Incentive Motivational Effects of Mediated-Polysubstance Pairings on Alcohol, Marijuana, and Junk Food Craving

Clayton, Russell B.; Bailey, Rachel L.; Liu, Jiawei

doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1601304

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nonetheless, care (e.g., in cue representation and covariate analysis) should be taken when combining groups of individuals who use the same drug (e.g., opioids) but self-administer it via different routes (e.g., intravenous vs. oral; McHugh, Fulciniti, Mashhoon, & Weiss, 2016) within the same sample or study. Though researchers typically aim to isolate a single or “primary” drug in FDCR studies, other drug use should also be considered, as sensory cues of the “primary” drug may nonetheless trigger neurobehavioral responses to multiple drugs, particularly when such drugs are commonly used simultaneously (e.g., cannabis and alcohol Clayton, Bailey, & Liu, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Though researchers typically aim to isolate a single or "primary" drug in FDCR studies, other drug use should also be considered, as sensory cues of the "primary" drug may nonetheless trigger neurobehavioral responses to multiple drugs, particularly when such drugs are commonly used simultaneously (e.g., cannabis and alcohol [81]). Only 17% of studies failed to report use of other drugs.…”

Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus

Ekhtiari

Secretariat

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cue reactivity is one of the most frequently used paradigms in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of substance use disorders (SUDs). Although there have been many promising results elucidating the neurocognitive mechanisms of SUDs and SUD treatments, heterogeneities in participant characteristics, task design, craving assessment, scanning preparation and analysis decisions limit rigor and reproducibility in the field of fMRI of drug cue reactivity (FDCR), hampering clinical translation and synthesis by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The aim of this consensus paper and Delphi study is to outline the important methodological aspects of FDCR studies and present a list of items and recommendations that should be taken into account when designing FDCR studies and reporting their results. Methods: Fifty-five FDCR scientists from around the world participated. First, an initial checklist of items deemed important in FDCR studies was developed by a group of members from the ENIGMA Addiction Consortium based on a systematic review. Then, using a modified Delphi consensus method, all experts were asked to comment on, revise or add items to the initial checklist. Subsequently, experts were asked to rate the importance of the items. Results: Thirty-seven items were proposed in the first round. After the commenting phase, seven new items suggested by experts were added and six were removed. The final 38 items that reached a defined consensus threshold in the rating phase were classified under seven categories and are considered important for conducting and reporting in any FDCR study. Conclusion: This paper proposes a list of items and additional recommendations that researchers in the field of FDCR are encouraged to note and report when designing an FDCR study and reporting its results. Along with the presentation of a quality control checklist with Yes/No ratable items, various challenges in moving towards greater homogeneity in FDCR research and widespread use of FDCR to investigate SUDs and develop clinically relevant biomarkers are discussed. Key Terms: fMRI, Cue Reactivity, Addiction, Craving, Biomarker, Harmonization, Checklist

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus

Ekhtiari

Secretariat

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the effectiveness of fear appeals is often questioned. In some cases, fear appeal messages can create stimulus rejection responses (e.g., Leshner et al, 2018 ) and in others, psychological reactance responses including anger and counterarguments (e.g., Nabi et al, 2008 ; Clayton et al, 2019a , b , 2020 ). One potential solution to this problem is for message designers to include enough positive information that the messages do not create rejection or reactance.…”

Section: Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With this previous research in mind, work in health communication has noted the appetitive and incentivizing effects of different types of substance cues (i.e., tobacco, vaping, alcohol, and food) in prevention messages, potentially creating unintended effects. These cues elicit approach tendencies indicated by increased craving, self-reported positivity, physiologically appetitive responses, and attention ( Bailey, 2015 , 2017 ; Clayton et al, 2017a , b , 2019a , b ; Liu and Bailey, 2019 ; Sanders-Jackson et al, 2019 ) increased visual fixation ( Sanders-Jackson et al, 2011 ); and greater memory for the cues ( Clayton et al, 2017b ; Bailey et al, 2018 ; Sanders-Jackson et al, 2019 ). The important take-away from this growing evidence is that message designers must understand how these cues function, particularly in fear appeal messaging, which use them to gain attention ( Clayton et al, 2017a ) and potentially inhibit message rejection ( Bailey et al, 2018 ; Sarge and Gong, 2019 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social Facilitation in Fear Appeals Creates Positive Affect but Inhibits Healthy Eating Intentions

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social facilitation of eating plays a significant role in influencing individuals’ eating decisions. However, how social eating cues are processed in health promotion messages is unclear. This study examined individuals’ food craving in response to social cues in images (Experiment 1) and emotional experiences, perceived threat, perceived efficacy, behavioral intentions, and motivational coactivation elicited by social eating cues in obesity prevention fear appeals (Experiment 2). Results suggested that the presence of a group of people eating in an image facilitated food craving for the presented foods. Moreover, fear appeals that presented obesity and its consequences with more social eating cues, versus individual eating cues, generated greater positive emotional responses, perceived threat severity, response and self-efficacy, and motivational coactivation indicating more attention and threat vigilance. However, these cues also generated fewer self-reported intentions to change unhealthy eating behaviors. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

show abstract

Cross-fading: The importance of tissue injury research on dual misuse of alcohol and JUUL

Chudomelka

Wyatt²

2020

Alcohol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conditioned “Cross Fading”: The Incentive Motivational Effects of Mediated-Polysubstance Pairings on Alcohol, Marijuana, and Junk Food Craving

Cited by 9 publications

References 41 publications

A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus

A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus

Social Facilitation in Fear Appeals Creates Positive Affect but Inhibits Healthy Eating Intentions

Cross-fading: The importance of tissue injury research on dual misuse of alcohol and JUUL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About