Why We Eat What We Eat: The Psychology of Eating.
DOI: 10.1037/10291-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned food preferences.

Abstract: his chapter reviews the various ways animals, including humans, form T preferences for foods through experience and how these preferences might be changed. As will be seen, in omnivores such as rats and people, most food preferences are produced by experience. This fact is counterintuitive because individuals appear to have such pronounced likes and dislikes on their first encounter with a food; yet few of these preferences are built in. Exposure to food with no consequences increases liking; however, if there… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent theories about the nature of conditioned flavour preferences suggest that these may combine hedonic conditioning and expectancy learning (e.g. Rozin and Zellner 1985;Capaldi 1992). Given the lack of insight into the nature of the present study reported during debriefing, subjects appeared to have no conscious awareness of the role of caffeine in the study, or the contingent relationship between caffeine and the drinks they consumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent theories about the nature of conditioned flavour preferences suggest that these may combine hedonic conditioning and expectancy learning (e.g. Rozin and Zellner 1985;Capaldi 1992). Given the lack of insight into the nature of the present study reported during debriefing, subjects appeared to have no conscious awareness of the role of caffeine in the study, or the contingent relationship between caffeine and the drinks they consumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Holland andRescorla 1975, see Dickinson andDawson 1987). Since flavour preference conditioning is believed to be based (at least partly) on Pavlovian conditioning (see Booth 1985;Sclafani 1991;Capaldi 1992), an explanation for the changes at test in group U/Caffeine in terms of irrelevant incentive seems unlikely, although the slight change in rated novelty at test suggest these ideas are worthy of further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions Previous studies in animals and humans have shown that repeated experience of a novel flavour in association with a positive postingestive consequence can increase liking or preference for the flavour (Brunstrom, 2005;Capaldi, 1992;Zellner, 1991). This effect is usually defined as flavour -consequence learning and is interpreted as an example of classical conditioning.…”
Section: Caffeine Deprivation State Modulates Expression Of Acquired mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Government officials and consumer advocates in Australia, Canada, the United States and the European Union have charged the tobacco industry with introducing such sweet flavoured cigarettes as an attempt to appeal to new smokers 1 2 3 4 5 6. It is known that sweet flavours encourage trial of unfamiliar foods and are particularly palatable to youths 7 8. Accordingly, there is reason to be concerned that flavoured cigarettes may serve as a means to introduce youths to tobacco, and that these cigarettes may be especially appealing to high sensation-seeking youths who are predisposed towards stimuli that offer a novel and potentially heightened sensory experience 9 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%