2019
DOI: 10.1037/bne0000291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned hedonic responses elicited by contextual cues paired with nausea or with internal pain.

Abstract: Pairing a taste with either internal pain or nausea, despite equivalent effects on voluntary consumption, has dissociable effects on hedonic responses: only pairing with nausea results in the production of disgust reactions, while pairing with internal pain results in conditioned fear as indicated by immobility. Here, we use orofacial reactions to examine the hedonic responses elicited by contextual, nonflavor, cues paired with nausea produced by injection of LiCl or internal pain caused by injection of hypert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that rearing durations, a measure of healthy exploratory behavior [ 2 , 70 , 71 , 78 – 80 ], drop at approximately the same time is consistent with decades of work showing that poisoning-related behaviors, and specifically those brought on by systemic nausea, emerge (depending on dose) at roughly 10 to 15 min post administration [ 2 4 , 78 ]. In our hands, the emergence of this LiCl-induced behavioral change closely mirrors the change in GC μ power induced by the same LiCl dose, implicating the process whereby an animal experiences illness in generation of these neural changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The finding that rearing durations, a measure of healthy exploratory behavior [ 2 , 70 , 71 , 78 – 80 ], drop at approximately the same time is consistent with decades of work showing that poisoning-related behaviors, and specifically those brought on by systemic nausea, emerge (depending on dose) at roughly 10 to 15 min post administration [ 2 4 , 78 ]. In our hands, the emergence of this LiCl-induced behavioral change closely mirrors the change in GC μ power induced by the same LiCl dose, implicating the process whereby an animal experiences illness in generation of these neural changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In both the literature and our current data, the latency of these changes in µ are strongly correlated with the appearance of illness-related behaviors [70]. We show that rearing durations, a measure of healthy exploratory behavior [2, 64, 65, 70-72], drop starting at approximately 12min post-LiCl injection. This finding is consistent with decades of work showing that poisoning-related behaviors, and specifically those brought on by systemic nausea, emerge (depending on dose) at roughly 10min post administration [2-4, 70].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We show that rearing durations, a measure of healthy exploratory behavior [2,64,65,[70][71][72], drop starting at approximately 12min post-LiCl injection. This finding is consistent with decades of work showing that poisoning-related behaviors, and specifically those brought on by systemic nausea, emerge (depending on dose) at roughly 10min post administration [2][3][4]70].…”
Section: Illness-related Changes In Taste Coding Occur In Single Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they show that claims for specialisation of central processes have been based on evidence that is no longer compelling. By contrast, recent work (main text) has provided positive evidence for specialisation of peripheral processes: for both flavour and non-flavour stimuli, illness, and pain elicit very different motor outputs [48,49].…”
Section: Box 1 Taste-aversion Learningmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, in addition to reduced consumption when the flavours are subsequently presented alone, LiCl-induced nausea results in orofacial reactions indicative of disgust, whereas hypertonic saline-based pain results in freezing indicative of fear. Crucially, these outcome-specific responses are also displayed with non-flavour cues that were previously paired with LiCl or hypertonic saline [49]. Therefore, there is indeed something special about aversion learning.…”
Section: Taste Aversionmentioning
confidence: 97%