2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned inhibition of emotional responses: Retardation and summation with cues for IAPS outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing such a phenomenon would be sufficient to certify that an antagonistic tendency has developed, thus discounting the need to employ summation and retardation techniques. A study by Thurston and Cassaday (2015) demonstrated conditioned inhibition using this method. The evaluative conditioning paradigm employed by these authors was successful in promoting conditioned inhibition in the aversive domain, yet underpowered to do so in the appetitive domain.…”
Section: Conditioned Inhibition: the Cumulative Effect Of Inhibitory ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Observing such a phenomenon would be sufficient to certify that an antagonistic tendency has developed, thus discounting the need to employ summation and retardation techniques. A study by Thurston and Cassaday (2015) demonstrated conditioned inhibition using this method. The evaluative conditioning paradigm employed by these authors was successful in promoting conditioned inhibition in the aversive domain, yet underpowered to do so in the appetitive domain.…”
Section: Conditioned Inhibition: the Cumulative Effect Of Inhibitory ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the sake of this study, the motivational factors were grouped into dissatisfiers and satisfiers. Dissatisfiers included aspects such as working conditions, salary and benefits and supervision, whilst satisfiers included recognition, responsibility, interesting work, growth, challenging work, achievement and continuous learning (Thurston, 2013).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two test method to confirm conditioned inhibition (by both summation and retardation tests) has been widely adopted in animal studies, but has been harder to implement in human studies. In human studies, there have been some reports of conditioned inhibition confirmed by summation test ( He et al, 2013 ; Heym et al, 2014 ; Thurston and Cassaday, 2015 ) but these have been relatively few ( Sosa and dos Santos, 2019 ; Sosa and Ramίrez, 2019 ). Indeed, it has been argued that studies of feature negative inhibitory discrimination learning of the kind typically used to successfully demonstrate conditioned inhibition, but which do not include (or do not subsequently pass) the formal tests to confirm conditioned inhibition should also be considered ( Sosa and dos Santos, 2019 ; Sosa and Ramίrez, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%