2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned Place Preference Reveals Tonic Pain in an Animal Model of Central Pain

Abstract: A limitation of animal models of central pain is their inability to recapitulate all clinical characteristics of the human condition. Specifically, many animal models rely on reflexive measures of hypersensitivity and ignore, or cannot assess spontaneous pain, the hallmark characteristic of central pain in humans. Here, we adopt a conditioned place preference paradigm to test if animals with lesions in the anterolateral quadrant of the spinal cord develop signs consistent with spontaneous pain. This paradigm r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, assessment of wellbeing and functional rehabilitation should also be included in tbe screening process of analgesic drugs at tbe preclinical level. Accordingly, improved but more complex approaches have recently been proposed to measure pain and its effects, like conditioned place preference/aversion paradigms (53,(82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)88), rat grimace scale (89), or spontaneous innate bebaviors {e.g., burrowing; refs. 90,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, assessment of wellbeing and functional rehabilitation should also be included in tbe screening process of analgesic drugs at tbe preclinical level. Accordingly, improved but more complex approaches have recently been proposed to measure pain and its effects, like conditioned place preference/aversion paradigms (53,(82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)88), rat grimace scale (89), or spontaneous innate bebaviors {e.g., burrowing; refs. 90,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used CPP test to investigate whether DSS treatment induced ongoing abdominal discomfort/aversive state. As previously shown in models of neuropathic or chronic inflammatory pain, relief of pain/discomfort by analgesic treatment is rewarding and reinforces behaviors associated with the treatment (11,18). We infused the colon with 2% lidocaine jelly to impair afferent nerve activity, and we assessed the ability of control and DSS rats to associate analgesic treatment with a chamber providing relief.…”
Section: Spontaneous Activity and Sensitization Of Afferent Neurons Bmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Importantly, CPP has been demonstrated in injured rats following pain-relieving treatments that do not produce preference in uninjured animals. Thus, analgesic treatments including peripheral nerve block, intrathecal administration of ω-conotoxin or clonidine, or RVM lidocaine may become rewarding in the presence of ongoing pain 31,34,67,72,74 . This conclusion is consistent with the concept of negative reinforcement elicited by relief of an aversive state.…”
Section: Preclinical Measures Of Pain Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference score, calculated as increased time spent in the drug-paired chamber on test day compared to the day before conditioning, indicates preference for the drug treatment. Single-trial protocols are appropriate when the treatments employed produce rapid change in pain affect (for example, peripheral nerve block, intrathecal clonidine, RVM lidocaine, electrical stimulation of motor cortex) 67,72,74 . The effects of slow-acting drugs can be revealed if the drug is given as a pretreatment that may produce relief of the pain-induced aversive state and prevent CPP to a rapidly acting pain reliever.…”
Section: Modulation Of Pain and Reward/motivation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%