1960
DOI: 10.1037/h0043356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioning performance of high- and low-anxious Ss in the absence of a warning signal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first finding, where there was no ready signal, is contrary to those of Spence and Weyant (1960) and Baron and Connor (1960). The second finding, where there was a ready signal, is contrary to those of Taylor (1951) and Spence and Taylor (1951).…”
Section: Experiments 7mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first finding, where there was no ready signal, is contrary to those of Spence and Weyant (1960) and Baron and Connor (1960). The second finding, where there was a ready signal, is contrary to those of Taylor (1951) and Spence and Taylor (1951).…”
Section: Experiments 7mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…, Spence and Taylor (1951), Spence and Weyant (1960), and Baron and Connor (1960), among others, have shown that highly anxious 5s develop conditioned eyeblinks at a faster rate and to a higher asymptote than less anxious 5s. The two experiments reported here are practically identical in methodology with those mentioned above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using the MAS, healthy college-aged individuals were classified as high anxiety (upper 75–80% of scores) and low anxiety (lower 20–25% of scores). In a series of studies, high-anxiety individuals were found to exhibit facilitated eyeblink classical conditioning as compared to low-anxiety individuals (Spence and Taylor, 1951, 1953; Taylor, 1951, 1956; Farber and Spence, 1953; Spence and Farber, 1953, 1954; Spence and Beecroft, 1954; Spence and Weyant, 1960; Spence and Spence, 1966). There was also a gender effect with females having higher manifest anxiety scores than males.…”
Section: Enhanced Classical Eyeblink Conditioning With Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the construction of the Taylor Manifest Anxiety scale (Taylor, 1953), a number of studies (Baron & Connor, 1960;Caldwell & Cromwell, 1959;Spence & Farber, 1953;Spence, Farber, & Taylor, 1954;Spence & Taylor, 1951, 1953Spence & Weyant 1960;Taylor, 1951) have reported a positive relationship between conditionability and score on the MA scale (Manifest Anxiety scale). Similarly, Spence and Beecroft (1954) and Spence and Farber (1954) report greater responsiveness to the reinforced stimulus in the classical discrimination learning situation, as well as some trend (nonsignificant) for better discrimination between reinforced and nonreinforced stimuli, in 5s who scored high, rather than low, on the MA scale.…”
Section: Pennsylvania State Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a blink was not required (Hilgard et al, 1951), the latter condition did not obtain. When a ready signal was not employed, the results are conflicting: Baron and Connor (1960) and Spence and Weyant (1960) report positive results, while Prokasy and Truax (1959) and King (1958) report negative results.…”
Section: Pennsylvania State Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%