It is a curious fact of the biology of the modem population of Britain that, whereas there is little association between menarcheal age and social class (Douglas, 1964;Nisbet and Illesley, 1963), there remain by contrast clear differences in height and weight between children of different socioeconomic groups. These physique differences persist into adulthood (Clements and Pickett, 1957;Thomson, 1959). This contrast between menarcheal age and body size is the more surprising since both share in the well-established secular trend towards earlier attainment of the former and increase of the latter (Tanner, 1962(Tanner, , 1965.A recent and continuing study of girls in a Welsh college (Roberts and Dann, 1967), the object of which was to assess the relative contributions of particular factors of the environment to variation in menarcheal age, showed, as in other recent studies in Britain, no detectable effect of socio-economic status on menarcheal age. Possible explanations proposed were that the Registrar General's socioeconomic categories are no longer meaningful in terms of expenditure on food, standards of housing, etc., factors which influence biological development; or that socio-economic differences have been eliminated as effective influences of biological development during the growth of the subjects. In the latter respect the sample was unusually uniform; the years of birth (1939)(1940)(1941)(1942)(1943)(1944)(1945)(1946) and early life of the subjects covered a period of economic stringency and nutritional uniformity, and indeed it was this relative homogeneity that prompted the initial analysis. In