2016
DOI: 10.1080/2156857x.2016.1156018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditions for recovery from alcohol and drug abuse – comparisons between male and female clients of different social position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other two groups (IW and MM) refer to the group more as a forum for conversation/discussion, which in previous research has been described as structural cohesion (Burlingame et al, 2011). Earlier analyses of the data material where the groups were compared according to factors not related to treatment (Skogens & von Greiff, 2016) can shed more light on this result. In that analyses, the IM and the MW groups were the ones differing the most from each other except in one aspect: they seemed to experience greater loneliness than the other two groups.…”
Section: The Group As An Important Factormentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The other two groups (IW and MM) refer to the group more as a forum for conversation/discussion, which in previous research has been described as structural cohesion (Burlingame et al, 2011). Earlier analyses of the data material where the groups were compared according to factors not related to treatment (Skogens & von Greiff, 2016) can shed more light on this result. In that analyses, the IM and the MW groups were the ones differing the most from each other except in one aspect: they seemed to experience greater loneliness than the other two groups.…”
Section: The Group As An Important Factormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, previous research also indicates that external similarities become less important later in the change process and are in many ways replaced by cohesion built on other things, such as sharing the need for change and experiences of AOD problems (Russell & Gockel, 2005;Skogens & von Greiff, 2016). This external homogeneity may thus be more of a factor in treatment interventions and less so in aftercare or in self-help groups (such as AA or NA) where the cohesion and safety lie in the shared problems that the self-help group focus on (Pooler et al, 2014;von Greiff & Skogens, 2014).…”
Section: The Staff As An Important Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These four areas are used to explain the variation in different people's ability to recover from alcohol and other drug (AOD)-related problems (Cloud and Granfield 2008). Research has shown that RC is theoretically and practically useful due to its ability to capture both personal attributes as well as context-related preconditions that may increase or decrease an individual's chances and ability to recover from AOD-related problems (Best and Laudet 2010;Groshkova, Best, and White 2013;Morton, O'Reilly, and O'Brien 2016;Skogens and von Greiff 2016). Scientific progress concerning recovery and recovery capital has resulted in an ambition to quantify and measure an individual's level of capital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%