2000
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0072:cfteos]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditions for the Evolution of Soldier Sperm Classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-copulatory sexual selection including both sperm competition and cryptic female choice may be a potent selective force favouring cooperating sperm and selecting against individually performing sperm. Two theoretical approaches have shown that the evolution of the differentiation of sperm shape and function among sibling sperm in response to post-copulatory sexual selection is possible (Kura & Nakashima 2000, Holman & Snook 2006. One model showed that a 'soldier sperm class' may evolve where certain sperm attack rival sperm by potentially destroying themselves (Kura & Nakashima 2000).…”
Section: Sperm Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Post-copulatory sexual selection including both sperm competition and cryptic female choice may be a potent selective force favouring cooperating sperm and selecting against individually performing sperm. Two theoretical approaches have shown that the evolution of the differentiation of sperm shape and function among sibling sperm in response to post-copulatory sexual selection is possible (Kura & Nakashima 2000, Holman & Snook 2006. One model showed that a 'soldier sperm class' may evolve where certain sperm attack rival sperm by potentially destroying themselves (Kura & Nakashima 2000).…”
Section: Sperm Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two theoretical approaches have shown that the evolution of the differentiation of sperm shape and function among sibling sperm in response to post-copulatory sexual selection is possible (Kura & Nakashima 2000, Holman & Snook 2006. One model showed that a 'soldier sperm class' may evolve where certain sperm attack rival sperm by potentially destroying themselves (Kura & Nakashima 2000). Similarly, a subsequent model showed that sperm heteromorphism may evolve if non-fertilising sperm protect fertilising sperm from female spermicide (Holman & Snook 2006).…”
Section: Sperm Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, sperm emitted from multiple males compete each other for eggs. It is predicted that sperm competition may result in elimination or displacement of eusperm from previous males, blocking or destruction of the non-kin eusperm (soldier sperm; Kura and Nakashima 2000), and preventing or delaying further mating of females. A possible role correlated to sperm competition has been also reported by Hayakawa (2007), for the unflagellate parasperm in a non-copulatory marine cottoid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that traits have the same dimensionality and complexity, the coefficient of variation is suitable to directly compare the magnitude of trait variation, because it corrects for the general tendency for morphological variance (i.e., the square of the standard deviation) to scale proportional to the square of the trait mean (Lande, 1977). Fertile sperm are longer than nonfertile sperm in all the taxa examined (see also Kura and Nakashima, 2000). Thus, if this statistical tendency alone were affecting our response variable (CV), it would result in more variation among the longer fertile than among the shorter nonfertile sperm, contrary to our functional prediction that fertile sperm should vary less.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%