2023
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2181305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condom Use Beliefs Differ According to Regulatory Focus: A Mixed-Methods Study in Portugal and Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the study of Grubb [5] found higher rates of barrier method use among adolescents whose sexual partners preferred to use barrier methods and who were able to openly communicate their desire to use them. However, some authors report that barrier method use decreases when the partner is perceived as safe, i.e., at low risk of transmitting STIs [63]. In this regard, the participants stated that, in some relationships, one partner manipulates the other to avoid using protective methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the study of Grubb [5] found higher rates of barrier method use among adolescents whose sexual partners preferred to use barrier methods and who were able to openly communicate their desire to use them. However, some authors report that barrier method use decreases when the partner is perceived as safe, i.e., at low risk of transmitting STIs [63]. In this regard, the participants stated that, in some relationships, one partner manipulates the other to avoid using protective methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argued that such practices should be examined from a regulatory focus perspective, as fundamental motives for safety or pleasure are crucial for risk perception and risk-taking behaviors (Bryant & Dunford, 2008;Klein & Cerully, 2007;Whiting et al, 2019). There is evidence that regulatory focus differences shape how people perceive sexual health risks and pursue their sexual goals (e.g., Evans-Paulson et al, 2022;Rodrigues et al, 2020Rodrigues et al, , 2022, their STI knowledge and sexual health practices , and their condom beliefs (Rodrigues, Carvalho, al., 2023). Building upon this evidence, we examined whether being focused on prevention or promotion also determined condom use intentions depending on condom availability delays and STI risk cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study offers important insights that can help foster consistent condom use and consequently lower STI rates. Despite several efforts to change the narrative attached to condom use (e.g., development of erectogenic condoms; Gallo et al, 2022), there is still a prevalent belief that condoms are barriers not only against infections and unwanted pregnancies but also limit sexual pleasure and intimacy (Rodrigues, Carvalho, et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey could be presented either in Portuguese or Spanish. More details about the procedure are reported elsewhere (Rodrigues, Carvalho, et al, 2023;. A copy of the survey in each language, and the respective list of measures in English, are available (https:// osf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%