2018
DOI: 10.1177/1049732317749196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducting Joint Interviews With Couples: Ethical and Methodological Challenges

Abstract: Scholars have recently begun to discuss joint interviewing from a methodological perspective, generally presenting a favorable view of this mode of interviewing. In the present article, the author draws on her experiences with interviewing obstructive sleep apnea patients and their partners to shed further light on the methodological and ethical challenges of joint interviews. Specifically, it is shown that joint interviews may become a site in which one partner silences the other and enacts symbolic violence,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen sleep partners were recruited in this way. However, because interviewing couples either separately or jointly entails ethical and methodological challenges (Zarhin, 2016b, 2018c), I collected supplementary data in 2017 by interviewing and analyzing the accounts of six sleep partners of patients who were not included in the sample. These sleep partners were recruited at the same sleep center.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen sleep partners were recruited in this way. However, because interviewing couples either separately or jointly entails ethical and methodological challenges (Zarhin, 2016b, 2018c), I collected supplementary data in 2017 by interviewing and analyzing the accounts of six sleep partners of patients who were not included in the sample. These sleep partners were recruited at the same sleep center.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint interviewformat (which applied to themajority of interviews) will influence the expression of personal viewpoints due to the pressures imposed by the copresence of interviewees (Taylor & de Vocht, 2011). Moreover, it has been highlighted that joint interviews can prevent the researcher from giving an equal voice to both partners (Zarhin, 2018). These challenges can have particular salience where a carer/cared-for dynamic shapes the relationship of the interviewees.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, joint interviewing has also several advantages as partners can comfort each other if one partner recounts painful experiences. Additionally, dyadic interviewing can provide insights into the shared experiences and meanings of the couple, which is less likely to achieve in individual interviews as reproductive decision-making is a shared experience [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%