Conducting large, repeated, multi-game economic experiments using mobile platforms

Abstract

We demonstrate the possibility of conducting synchronous, repeated, multi-game economic decision-making experiments with hundreds of subjects in-person or remotely with live streaming using entirely mobile platforms. Our experiment provides important proof-of-concept that such experiments are not only possible, but yield recognizable results as well as new insights, blurring the line between laboratory and field experiments. Specifically, our findings from 8 different experimental economics games and tasks replicate existing results from traditional laboratory experiments despite the fact that subjects play those games/task in a specific order and regardless of whether the experiment was conducted in person or remotely. We further leverage our large subject population to study the effect of large (N = 100) versus small (N = 10) group sizes on behavior in three of the scalable games that we study. While our results are largely consistent with existing findings for small groups, increases in group size are shown to matter for the robustness of those findings.

Computational Analysis of the Properties of Post-Keynesian Endogenous Money Systems

“…Climate reports have become increasingly alarming (IPCC 2018(IPCC , 2019a(IPCC , 2019b, and at the UN conference of 2019 4 , it was claimed there were only 11 years left to turn the tide on climate change. Pragmatic, innovative and experimental approaches such as using large-scale game simulations (Li et al 2021;Ramsey and Renault 2020) could provide a solution.…”

Insurance demand experiments: Comparing crowdworking to the lab

“…A few studies find that online subjects exhibit behaviors similar to in‐person subjects, but their behaviors tend to diverge when engaging in more complex tasks. Li et al (2021) ask laboratory and online subjects to make a series of resource allocation decisions, assigning subjects to either a simple or complex condition. Both subject pools perform worse in the more complex condition, but online subjects have a greater drop‐off in performance.…”

“…A common method of measuring risk attitudes is to use the self-reported general risk question (GRQ) of Dohmen et al (2011), as in Buso et al (2021). Holt and Laury's (2002) incentive-compatible lottery also appears in a number of studies, including Hergueux and Jacquemet (2015) and Li et al (2021). Many articles in the political science literature, such as Berinsky et al (2012) and Coppock (2019), index a subject's "risk acceptance" using answers to the seven hypothetical questions outlined in Kam and Simas (2010).…”

Insurance Demand Experiments: Comparing Crowdworking to the Lab

“…A common method of measuring risk attitudes is to use the self-reported general risk question (GRQ) of Dohmen et al (2011), as in Buso et al (2021). Holt and Laury's (2002) incentive-compatible lottery also appears in a number of studies, including Hergueux and Jacquemet (2015) and Li et al (2021). Many articles in the political science literature, such as Berinsky et al (2012) and Coppock (2019), index a subject's "risk acceptance" using answers to the seven hypothetical questions outlined in Kam and Simas (2010).…”