2006
DOI: 10.1177/1049732306293846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conducting Qualitative Interview Research With People With Expressive Language Difficulties

Abstract: Despite the increasing application of qualitative interviewing and analysis approaches, individuals with expressive language difficulties are still frequently excluded from such research. In this article, the authors seek to clarify the role for and importance of conducting qualitative interviews with respondents with impaired expressive language. They review current research with reference to studies conducted with individuals with intellectual disabilities or dementia, or those who have experienced stroke or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
176
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
176
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[159][160][161][162] Consequently, it has been argued that excluding vulnerable patients from the opportunity to take part in research on the basis of assumptions made about their experiences and preferences is discriminatory and restrictive. [163][164][165][166][167] However, we were well aware of the need to approach contacts with patients and family carers with the utmost care and sensitivity, and to be suitably responsive to patient and family carer reactions and preferences throughout the research. This respect for emotional boundaries relied on the interviewers' skills in recognising non-verbal cues in order to respond appropriately to each participant.…”
Section: Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[159][160][161][162] Consequently, it has been argued that excluding vulnerable patients from the opportunity to take part in research on the basis of assumptions made about their experiences and preferences is discriminatory and restrictive. [163][164][165][166][167] However, we were well aware of the need to approach contacts with patients and family carers with the utmost care and sensitivity, and to be suitably responsive to patient and family carer reactions and preferences throughout the research. This respect for emotional boundaries relied on the interviewers' skills in recognising non-verbal cues in order to respond appropriately to each participant.…”
Section: Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic precept is that a person should be regarded as competent until demonstrated otherwise, and that incompetence in one area of life does not mean incompetence in others (Holm, 2001). Researchers should be very sensitive to any verbal and non-verbal signs which might signal distress resulting from participation in the research project (Hubbard et al, 2002;Lloyd et al, 2006). When this is the case, the participant must be withdrawn immediately from the research protocol (Berghmans & Ter Meulen, 1995).…”
Section: Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research methods should align with the research problem, with selected paradigms and methodologies shaping the choice of methods (Silverman, 2010). Semi-structured interviews allowed the interviewer flexibility in selecting lines of questioning, and probing further if required (Lloyd and Gatherer, 2006). They were also used because perceptions of HE internationalisation in the university were that it was uncertain and dynamic, and such interviews would enable useful exploration of attitudes, motives, rationales and practices being investigated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%