1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.38.12582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction-band structure of graphite single crystals studied by angle-resolved inverse photoemission and target-current spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We always obtained • = (4.7 -t-0.1) eV, in excellent agreement with ~ = 4.7 eV [11,19] and with • = 4.6 eV [20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We always obtained • = (4.7 -t-0.1) eV, in excellent agreement with ~ = 4.7 eV [11,19] and with • = 4.6 eV [20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It should also be pointed out that identification of the fine structure in TCS (calculated curve 6 and experimental data [7] shown by curve 7) and LEET spectra through the negative second derivative Àd 2 IðE; XÞ=dE 2 is less efficient (see, e.g., Ref. [11]), because, in this case, the peaks shift markedly away from the band edges and a parasitic structure forms between them.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theoretical analysis of the fine structure of these spectra turned out to be difficult because of the need to take into account the diverse physical processes occurring in the interaction of a flux of primary electrons I p with the near-surface region of a crystal. For instance, the positions of the maxima E i ¼ Àd 2 I=dE 2 in the TCS of single-crystal graphite obtained at various primary-electron incidence angles (wave vectors k) have been studied and the final conduction-band states E ¼ E i as a function of E(k) have been constructed [11]. In this case, however, information on E(k) can be distorted by the combined effect of the structure of various bands, which requires a more detailed theoretical consideration.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low-energy electrons with kinetic energies E p below 1 keV are used to study the electronic structure of unoccupied high-level electronic states in very low-energy-electron diffraction (VLEED) [1][2][3], bremsstrahlung isochromat [4,5], inner-shell electron-energy loss [4,6], inverse photoemission (IPE) [4,7,8], secondary-electron emission [9,10], low-energy-electron transmission (LEET) [11][12][13][14][15], and absorbed (or target, total) current [8,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] spectroscopies. Having a high surface sensitivity and being nondestructive, the latter two methods are employed, in addition to analyzing elementary excitations and near-surface states, in monitoring surface cleanness in the course of surface treatments, determination of the work function, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%