Internodal conduction pathways are the communication apparatus of the cardiac conduction system conveying sinus node action potentials to the atrioventricular node and atrial working myocytes. In 1910, at the Deutschen Pathologischen Gesellschaft held in Erlangen, Charles Thörel related his discovery of an internodal bundle structured with Purkinje-like cells which was rejected by the participants who endorsed the leading doctrine that atrial contractile cardiomyocytes operated as internodal routes. Starting in 1963 and for five subsequent decades, two groups have continued to revisit this issue. The first, led by Thomas James, defended the histological existence of uninsulated, high-speed cord-like internodal conduction tracts. Although not supported by robust experimental data, this hypothesis achieved the status of a physiological creed in the scientific community. The second, led by Robert Anderson, systematically refuted this stance and adopted anisotropy as an innovative internodal conduction mechanism operating via spindle-shaped atrial contractile myocytes arranged in anisotropic bundles relaying SAN APs to their atrial destinations at physiologically required (fit-for-purpose) velocities to enable synchronized atrial systoles. Modern imaging and electrophysiological techniques can now clearly visualize muscular internodal and interatrial tracts and SAN depolarization electrical waves, confirming the existence of atrial conduction paths muscular in nature. Mastery of the current best science, anatomy, and physiology of the human atria is necessary for electrophysiologists to safely perform atrial radiofrequency ablation interventions to restore sinus rhythm in patients distressed by supraventricular arrhythmias.