2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c00686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction Mechanism in Graphene Oxide Membranes with Varied Water Content: From Proton Hopping Dominant to Ion Diffusion Dominant

Abstract: Proton conductors, particularly hydrated solid membranes, have various applications in sensors, fuel cells, and cellular biological systems. Unraveling the intrinsic proton transfer mechanism is critical for establishing the foundation of proton conduction. Two scenarios on electrical conduction, the Grotthuss and the vehicle mechanisms, have been reported by experiments and simulations. But separating and quantifying the contributions of these two components from experiments is difficult. Here, we present the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With different humidity varying from 55 to 80%, the conductivity (σ) of compound 1 gradually climbed up from 3.28 × 10 –5 to 4.50 × 10 –3 S cm –1 (Figure a,c), demonstrating a dramatic increase with relative humidity increasing, which may be due to the fact that more mobile proton transfer sites are provided by water molecules . On the other hand, the results are consistent with the water absorption isotherm, and the absorption of a large number of water molecules by compound 1 at high humidity to form hydrogen bonds with a large number of surface oxygen atoms in the interlayer also accelerates the proton transfer. In addition, as another crucial influence factor, temperature-dependent proton conductivity measurements also were probed by using the same sample 1 . As shown in Figure b, as the temperature rose from 30 to 75 °C under 80% RH, the conductivity increased continuously to 3.07 × 10 –2 S cm –1 , which was attributed to the acceleration of proton transfer with the temperature rising up (Figure b) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With different humidity varying from 55 to 80%, the conductivity (σ) of compound 1 gradually climbed up from 3.28 × 10 –5 to 4.50 × 10 –3 S cm –1 (Figure a,c), demonstrating a dramatic increase with relative humidity increasing, which may be due to the fact that more mobile proton transfer sites are provided by water molecules . On the other hand, the results are consistent with the water absorption isotherm, and the absorption of a large number of water molecules by compound 1 at high humidity to form hydrogen bonds with a large number of surface oxygen atoms in the interlayer also accelerates the proton transfer. In addition, as another crucial influence factor, temperature-dependent proton conductivity measurements also were probed by using the same sample 1 . As shown in Figure b, as the temperature rose from 30 to 75 °C under 80% RH, the conductivity increased continuously to 3.07 × 10 –2 S cm –1 , which was attributed to the acceleration of proton transfer with the temperature rising up (Figure b) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Likewise, the water molecules in its pores can form hydrogen bonds with the sulfonamide groups formed in the composite membrane, which serve as a proton transfer pathway, thus making the proton transport rate faster and the proton conductivity higher. The calculated activation energies of SCPEEK@MOF-2 and SPEEK/MOF-2 composite films are 0.35 and 0.22 eV, respectively, indicating that both proton conduction mechanisms are Grotthuss mechanisms (Figure c). The proton binds to a water molecule to form a hydronium ion and forms a hydrogen bond with a sulfonamide bond to transfer the proton to the next water molecule, thus forming the proton transport pathway (Figure ). Finally, the proton conductivity of SCPEEK@MOF-2 was tested at different RHs of 298 K (Figure S12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 In this case, research into the proton conduction mechanism of carbon proton conductors continues to be an area of intense investigation. [7][8][9][10] Two-dimensional (2D) oxidized carbons have been widely used as proton conductors because of their lamellar structure enabling excellent integrated compatibility, and chemical, thermal and mechanical stability. As a result, they have been used as a prototypical platform for the investigation of the proton transport mechanism of carbon-based proton conductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%