2010
DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2010.521309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive education: appraising the evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure describes the GRADE system and the Evidence Alert System and their relationship to each other. Table shows the included studies, best evidence levels grades and traffic light classification …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure describes the GRADE system and the Evidence Alert System and their relationship to each other. Table shows the included studies, best evidence levels grades and traffic light classification …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various types of groups provided such as Parent and Child Groups, Kindy/Pre-school Classes, Riding and Swimming, Specialised Groups and Individual Sessions (Conductive Education Canterbury, 2020;Conductive Education Wellington Trust, 2020; NZ foundation for Conductive Education, 2020). The CE programme has many benefits such as strengthening gross and fine motor skills, improving emotional, social, cognitive and communication areas, and also increasing motivation, confidence and wellbeing (Tuersley-Dixon & Frederickson, 2010).…”
Section: Methods Used By Conductors and Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() evaluated the effect of “conductive education” combined with inclusive education on social functioning of autistic children. Conductive education is an integrative intervention, originally developed in the 1940s by Hungarian physician András Peto, for children with neuro‐motor disabilities like cerebral palsy (Tuersley‐Dixon & Frederickson, ), incorporating forms of speech therapy, physical therapy, and occupational therapy to enable students to function in the world with as little special accommodation as possible. In the study, a total of 120 children with autism were randomly divided into two groups (60 people in each group).…”
Section: Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%