2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41061-020-0289-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks: Mechanisms, Design Strategies and Recent Advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 246 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many excellent reviews have focused on the synthesis, mechanisms, and miscellaneous applications of conductive MOFs [8][9][10][11], few of them focus on their photophysical properties (i.e., their responses under irradiation of laser). Therefore, in this review, we will discuss in detail the photophysical properties of conductive MOFs.…”
Section: Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many excellent reviews have focused on the synthesis, mechanisms, and miscellaneous applications of conductive MOFs [8][9][10][11], few of them focus on their photophysical properties (i.e., their responses under irradiation of laser). Therefore, in this review, we will discuss in detail the photophysical properties of conductive MOFs.…”
Section: Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figures S8 and S18, the proton conductivities of CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88A‐25% and CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88B‐125% reach 1.33 and 1.42 S cm −1 , respectively, at 75% RH and 353 K. Besides, as shown in Figures S22 and S18, CS/CMMIM@MIL‐53(Fe)‐75% and CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88B‐125% composite materials have surprisingly high proton conductivities, with 2.1 × 10 −3 and 1.28 × 10 −3 S cm −1 , respectively, at 75% RH and 263 K. In terms of material temperature range adaptability, the conductivities of CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88B‐125% are higher and more stable with the temperature changing from 263 to 353 K, the temperature range of which is much wider than that reported already. [ 48 ] From an economic point of view, CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88A‐25% is more practical at low temperature, and CS/CMMIM@MIL‐53(Fe)‐75% is more practical at high temperature. Above all, at a wider temperature range (263–353 K) and lower RH (75% RH to about 98% RH [ 35,37,49–53 ] ), the conductivities of the materials in this work are much higher than those for other composite materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These class of materials were developed to improve the surface area and pore volume by incorporation of different topological linkers. In IRMOF, IR stands for isoreticular, which means it is a series of MOFs with the same topology, but different pore size [14,20,22,23]. A series of different IRMOFs share similar pcu topology of IRMOF-n (n = 1-16).…”
Section: Reticular Chemistry and Isoreticular Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the electrical properties of MOFs and integration of them in micro-electronic devices is still at an early stage and remain under research when compared to other types of existing conducting materials [4,15] due to their insulating character. Although MOFs possess the properties of both organic and inorganic counterparts, they behave as electrical insulators or poor electrical conductors due to the poor overlapping between the π-orbitals of organic ligands and d-orbitals of the metal ion [20]. Yet, MOFs serving as an interface between (inorganic) hard and (organic) soft materials provide an opportunity for adapting various structure-property relationships that is related to wide range of parameters such as choice of metal ion, organic linker, and molecular designing approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%