2021
DOI: 10.3390/colloids5020020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive Nanofilms with Oppositely Charged Reduced Graphene Oxides as a Base for Electroactive Coatings and Sensors

Abstract: We demonstrate a method for the formation of multilayers composed of reduced graphene oxide (rGO), which can be used for transparent, conducting thin films. Using the layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of positively and negatively charged GO sheets, we could obtain thin films with highly controllable sheet resistance. The natural negative charge of graphene oxide was turned to positive by the amidation reaction. After forming the multilayer films, the graphene oxide underwent thermal reduction at temperatures above… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface charge of the titanium is said to be strongly positively charged [ 30 ] and the graphene oxide surface charge is generally found to be negative, but due to the amidation reaction, they tend to change as positively charged. The interaction between the positively charged nanoparticles and the negatively charged bacterial cell wall leads to the adhesion, penetration and destruction of the bacterial cells [ 31 ]. Another factor of activity is because it may depend on the concentration-dependent anti-microbial activity against Staphylococcus aureus when compared with Streptomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface charge of the titanium is said to be strongly positively charged [ 30 ] and the graphene oxide surface charge is generally found to be negative, but due to the amidation reaction, they tend to change as positively charged. The interaction between the positively charged nanoparticles and the negatively charged bacterial cell wall leads to the adhesion, penetration and destruction of the bacterial cells [ 31 ]. Another factor of activity is because it may depend on the concentration-dependent anti-microbial activity against Staphylococcus aureus when compared with Streptomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%