All Days 2003
DOI: 10.2118/82241-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity Maintenance: Long-Term Results from the Use of Conductivity Enhancement Material

Abstract: TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractIn 1997, a surface modification agent was introduced into the global stimulation market. The agent was designed to enhance and sustain fracture conductivity by making the proppant surface tacky. Several conductivity-enhancing mechanisms were suggested. Two important mechanisms resulting from increased surface tackiness are 1) increased proppant pack porosity resulting in increased pack permeability and 2) increased proppant pack stability that prevents encroa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of only the ASMA in the pad fluid did not have a significant positive impact on the productivity, suggesting that in this reservoir the key objective should be to have the MP transported deep into the reservoir and into the small secondary fractures. Despite of the inconclusive benefits of ASMA application in the pad fluid stages performed for this field trial, numerous previous treatments of ASMA coating on proppant during the proppant stages have provided significant conductivity enhancement for the near-wellbore propped fractures in this field, as discussed earlier, and in other field applications (Lehman et al 2003;Nguyen et al 1998Nguyen et al , 2008Weaver et al 1999;Weaver and Nguyen 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The presence of only the ASMA in the pad fluid did not have a significant positive impact on the productivity, suggesting that in this reservoir the key objective should be to have the MP transported deep into the reservoir and into the small secondary fractures. Despite of the inconclusive benefits of ASMA application in the pad fluid stages performed for this field trial, numerous previous treatments of ASMA coating on proppant during the proppant stages have provided significant conductivity enhancement for the near-wellbore propped fractures in this field, as discussed earlier, and in other field applications (Lehman et al 2003;Nguyen et al 1998Nguyen et al , 2008Weaver et al 1999;Weaver and Nguyen 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Instead of allowing formation particulates to migrate through the proppant pack, previous studies have shown that fracture conductivity (and hence, well productivity) can be enhanced and extended by effectively preventing these formation fines from invading the proppant pack (Blauch et al 1999;Lehman et al 2003;Dusterhoft et al 2004). Fines migration should be prevented (or stopped) far away from the wellbore, rather than allowing or waiting for the damage of the formation matrix or proppant pack to occur nearer to the wellbore.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain surfaces become tacky, thus having the ability to trap fines and prevent their migration into the pack and through the pack (Nguyen et al 1998 and. In addition to fines control, additional benefits of having proppant with a hydrophobic film coating include reduced fracturing gel damage and reduced proppant pack scale damage resulting in higher sustained fracture productivity (Ali et al 2000;Lehman et al 2003;Weaver et al 2005 andWeaver and Nguyen 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of allowing formation particulates to migrate through the proppant pack, recent studies have shown that fracture conductivity (and hence, well productivity) can be enhanced and prolonged by effectively preventing these formation fines from invading the proppant pack (Blauch et al 1999;Lehman et al 2003;Dusterhoft et al 2004). Fines migration should be prevented far away from the wellbore, rather than allowing or waiting for the damage of the formation matrix or proppant pack to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%