2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2718106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity Profile Determination by Eddy Current for Shot Peened Superalloy Surfaces Toward Residual Stress Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both techniques indicated that at any given frequency the measured AECC corresponds roughly to the actual electric conductivity at half of the standard penetration depth assuming that (i) the electric conductivity variation is limited to a shallow surface region of depth much less than the probe coil diameter, (ii) the relative change in electric conductivity is less than a few percents, and (iii) the electric conductivity depth profile is continuous and fairly smooth. Alternatively, best fitting of the measured electric coil impedance with the known analytical solution can be used assuming that the conductivity profile can be characterized by a small number of independent parameters [24]. Finally, the sought residual stress profile is calculated from the electric conductivity profile based on the piezoresistivity coefficient of the material, which is determined separately from material calibration measurements using known external applied stresses [17].…”
Section: Eddy Current Conductivity Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both techniques indicated that at any given frequency the measured AECC corresponds roughly to the actual electric conductivity at half of the standard penetration depth assuming that (i) the electric conductivity variation is limited to a shallow surface region of depth much less than the probe coil diameter, (ii) the relative change in electric conductivity is less than a few percents, and (iii) the electric conductivity depth profile is continuous and fairly smooth. Alternatively, best fitting of the measured electric coil impedance with the known analytical solution can be used assuming that the conductivity profile can be characterized by a small number of independent parameters [24]. Finally, the sought residual stress profile is calculated from the electric conductivity profile based on the piezoresistivity coefficient of the material, which is determined separately from material calibration measurements using known external applied stresses [17].…”
Section: Eddy Current Conductivity Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we cannot fully reconstruct the critical near-surface part of the residual stress profile in moderately peened components using only typical inspection frequencies below 10 MHz. In such cases, special high-frequency inspection techniques are needed to extend the frequency range up to 50-80 MHz, i.e., beyond the range of commercially available instruments [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Eddy Current Conductivity Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shot Peening (SP) uses spherical balls called shots or projectiles to impact the part surface at high velocities. SP has been traditionally used for nickel-based superalloys including IN718, waspaloy, IN100 and RR1000 [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Shot peening typically produces highly deformed surface layer, consisting of nanocrystalline structure and high density of statistically distributed dislocations, which improves fatigue life of the components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to traditional stress measurement of nondestructive testing methods like ultrasonic etc., eddy current thermography method have abilities to obtain the noncontact testing result of a single large detection area; achieve high detection precision and resolution of complex geometry component; use the distribution of residual stresses for prior detection in a wide range. In recent years, the application of eddy current thermography detection method to stress detection technology are popularity [13][14][15][16][17] , many studies are focus on the stress distribution and temperature response curve in thermal image graph with different stress states and various conductive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%