2018
DOI: 10.1177/0040517518792732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity, superhydrophobicity and mechanical properties of cotton fabric treated with polypyrrole by in-situ polymerization using the binary oxidants ammonium Peroxodisulfate and ferric chloride

Abstract: In this study, polypyrrole deposition and a superhydrophobic coating were applied to cotton fabrics to develop a self-cleaning and conductive fabric with electric heating performance. The binary oxidants ammonium peroxodisulfate and ferric chloride were introduced during the polymerization to adjust the size of the polypyrrole particles for creating diverse nano-scale roughness on the surface of the cotton fabrics and to prevent degradation in the mechanical properties of textiles. The in-situ polymerization … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consideration of Figure 3 indicates that, after application of polymers, the elongation at break and tensile strength were decreased moderately, compared to the reference sample, i.e., elongation at break by 3–11% (warp) and 0.04–16% (weft), and tensile strength by 3–18% (warp) and 7–22% (weft). This could be explained by the fact that the coating penetrates the fabric sample and inhibits the mobility of the yarns in the fabric structure, causing the fabric to become more rigid and inflexible [ 21 , 22 ]. The fabric rigidity depends also on the characteristics of the polymers used, the application conditions, and undesired linkages between the coated fibres, so-called bridges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consideration of Figure 3 indicates that, after application of polymers, the elongation at break and tensile strength were decreased moderately, compared to the reference sample, i.e., elongation at break by 3–11% (warp) and 0.04–16% (weft), and tensile strength by 3–18% (warp) and 7–22% (weft). This could be explained by the fact that the coating penetrates the fabric sample and inhibits the mobility of the yarns in the fabric structure, causing the fabric to become more rigid and inflexible [ 21 , 22 ]. The fabric rigidity depends also on the characteristics of the polymers used, the application conditions, and undesired linkages between the coated fibres, so-called bridges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because MIL-100(Fe) filled the space between the fibers, decreasing the mobility of the fibers. 24 The attached MIL-100(Fe) formed a layer on a fabric surface and fixed the MIL-100(Fe) and fibers; as a result, the yarns of MIL-100(Fe)@cotton were not loosened as much as those of cotton fabric, when immersed in dye solution for 60 h (L10 from Fig. 8(b) ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the binary oxidant of FeCl 3 and APS was used for chemical polymerisation, as APS has a higher polymerisation rate but a low solubility in DMSO, while also Cl − from FeCl 3 could act as a dopant for the conducting polymer to enhance the conductivity. 23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%