Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-3773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONDUIT - A new multidisciplinary integration environment for flight control development

Abstract: Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of individual design specifications within the standard and the choice of response type were guided by partially attended and moderate agility operational requirements. Optimization of the design parameters was performed using a quadratic programming approach, MATLAB, SIMULINK, and the MATLAB-based design package CONDUIT [15]. The design constraints and predicted pilot ratings for the aircraft in the hover trim/low speed operating regime are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of individual design specifications within the standard and the choice of response type were guided by partially attended and moderate agility operational requirements. Optimization of the design parameters was performed using a quadratic programming approach, MATLAB, SIMULINK, and the MATLAB-based design package CONDUIT [15]. The design constraints and predicted pilot ratings for the aircraft in the hover trim/low speed operating regime are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitness criterion is fairly simple, but it should be possible to add further refinements in the design problem. Fitness could be defined by directly computing handling qualities metrics, similar to the NASA/Army code CONDUIT 8 . Also, the use of nonlinear simulations with the complete aircraft model during optimization would give a more accurate evaluation and thus might be preferable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LQR (optimal control) [43] LQR control is applied to a quad-rotor UAV prototype for velocity and position control with the assistance of an indoor tracking system. H 1 (robust control) [12] H 1 -suboptimal controller is designed for the coupled MIMO attitude and heading dynamics, and further evaluated based on the selected handling qualities in CONDUIT [135] design environment.…”
Section: Control Technique Workmentioning
confidence: 99%