2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00247-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condylar erosion and disc displacement: detection with high-resolution ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
2
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
62
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study conducted by Emshoff et al, showed more precise outcomes on use of dynamic US instead of static US [34].Cut-off value was 2 mm in this study, whereas according to Tognini et al, joint effusion was seen when the distance between the lateral pole of condyle and lateral part of the articular capsule was greater than 3mm [35].…”
Section: Wwwjcdrnetcontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Another study conducted by Emshoff et al, showed more precise outcomes on use of dynamic US instead of static US [34].Cut-off value was 2 mm in this study, whereas according to Tognini et al, joint effusion was seen when the distance between the lateral pole of condyle and lateral part of the articular capsule was greater than 3mm [35].…”
Section: Wwwjcdrnetcontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…There is definitely scope for US for assessment of masseter muscle in real-time. This has been documented widely in the literature with masseter muscle thickness demonstrating differences in posterior crossbite cases and their relationship to TMDs 5,54,111,112 . But there is concern that some findings can be controversial and others produce non-conclusive results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is a noninvasive, dynamic, inexpensive imaging technique which can be useful in diagnosing articular disc displacements. Variable levels of sensitivity were reported in detection of disc displacement, therefore further studies are required [2][3][4][5][20][21][22][23][24]. It is a technique that depends widely on the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%